Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206280›Full record

ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2024

Sex and individual differences in the effect of chronic low-dose ethanol on behavioral strategy selection.

Kathleen G Bryant, Binay Singh, Jacqueline M Barker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathleen G BryantDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5084-0863
Binay SinghDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jacqueline M BarkerDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Arbitration Between Goal-directed and Habitual Ethanol Seeking by the Nucleus Accumbens Shell.R00AA024499 · NIAAA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI BARKER, JACQUELINE M · 2018 to 2020
$747k
Sex differences in regulation of reinstatement of ethanol seeking by nucleus accumbens glutamate signalingR21AA027629 · NIAAA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI BARKER, JACQUELINE M · 2020 to 2021
$397k
Low dose ethanol effects on reward learning and motivationF31AA029621 · NIAAA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI BRYANT, KATHLEEN GRACE · 2021 to 2022
$93k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA029621NIAAA NIH HHS F31AA029621NIAAA NIH HHS R00 AA024499NIAAA NIH HHS R00AA024499NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA027629NIAAA NIH HHS R21AA027629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of an alcohol use disorder (AUD) involves impaired behavioral control and flexibility. Behavioral inflexibility includes an inability to shift behavior in response to changes in behavioral outcomes. Low levels of ethanol drinking may promote the formation of inflexible, habitual reward seeking, but this may depend on the timing of ethanol exposure in relation to learning. The goal of this study was to determine whether a history of low-dose ethanol exposure promoted contingency-insensitive sucrose seeking and altered behavioral strategy selection.

methodsMale and female C57BL/6J mice were trained to perform a response (lever press) for sucrose on two different reinforcement schedules: one that is thought to promote inflexible responding (random interval) and one that maintains flexible responding (variable ratio [VR]). Following instrumental training each day, mice were exposed to saline or low-dose ethanol (0.5 g/kg; i.p.) either proximal (1 h after) or distal (4 h after) to learning. Mice were then tested for sensitivity to changes in contingency in a contingency degradation test.

resultsA history of low-dose ethanol exposure shifted behavioral strategy selection, as measured by reward tracking behavior, but this depended on sex and reinforcement schedule history. Both male and female mice used different strategies depending on the reinforcement schedule, but only males exhibited ethanol-induced shifts in strategy selection. A history of low-dose ethanol exposure did not impact contingency sensitivity in males but promoted insensitivity in females specifically on the VR lever.

conclusionsFemale mice show distinct behavioral effects of repeated, low-dose ethanol exposure as compared to males, with sex differences in the use of reward tracking strategies to guide behavior. Future studies should investigate sex differences in the neural consequences of chronic low-dose ethanol exposure that may underlie behavioral changes.

Indexed as

behaviorhabitlow-dosesex

Identifiers

PMID38206280
PMCPMC10784635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.