Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206185›Full record

ReviewEndocrine reviews2024

Imaging of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas.

Henri J L M Timmers, David Taïeb, Karel Pacak, Jacques W M Lenders

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Genotype-dependent [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Comparison ofMolecular imaging and biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal paraganglioma resection: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henri J L M TimmersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1208-5748
David TaïebDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France and European Center for Research in Medical Imaging, Aix-Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0400-7600
Karel PacakSection on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1583, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3541-3767
Jacques W M LendersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Diagnosis &Pathophysiology of PheochromocytomaZ01HD008735 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI PACAK, KAREL · 2001 to 2008
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HD008735NIH HHS Z1AHD008735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas are unique in their highly variable molecular landscape driven by genetic alterations, either germline or somatic. These mutations translate into different clusters with distinct tumor locations, biochemical/metabolomic features, tumor cell characteristics (eg, receptors, transporters), and disease course. Such tumor heterogeneity calls for different imaging strategies in order to provide proper diagnosis and follow-up. This also warrants selection of the most appropriate and locally available imaging modalities tailored to an individual patient based on consideration of many relevant factors including age, (anticipated) tumor location(s), size, and multifocality, underlying genotype, biochemical phenotype, chance of metastases, as well as the patient's personal preference and treatment goals. Anatomical imaging using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and functional imaging using positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography are currently a cornerstone in the evaluation of patients with pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. In modern nuclear medicine practice, a multitude of radionuclides with relevance to diagnostic work-up and treatment planning (theranostics) is available, including radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine, fluorodeoxyglucose, fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine, and somatostatin analogues. This review amalgamates up-to-date imaging guidelines, expert opinions, and recent discoveries. Based on the rich toolbox for anatomical and functional imaging that is currently available, we aim to define a customized approach in patients with (suspected) pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas from a practical clinical perspective. We provide imaging algorithms for different starting points for initial diagnostic work-up and course of the disease, including adrenal incidentaloma, established biochemical diagnosis, postsurgical follow-up, tumor screening in pathogenic variant carriers, staging and restaging of metastatic disease, theranostics, and response monitoring.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsParagangliomaPheochromocytomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyCTMRIparagangliomaPETpheochromocytomaSPECT

Identifiers

PMID38206185
PMCPMC11074798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.