Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38206000›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024

Evaluation of the VioOne HIV profile supplemental assay.

Brian J Franz, Heidi Register, Vickie Sullivan, Kimbrough Warber, Timothy C Granade, Caleb Cornaby, Mark E Magee, Thomas N Denny, Don Lockwood, John L Schmitz

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brian J FranzDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Heidi RegisterDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Vickie SullivanDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kimbrough WarberClinical Reference Laboratory, Clinical Reference Laboratory Inc. , Lenexa, Kansas, USA.
Timothy C GranadeDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Caleb CornabyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Mark E MageeClinical Reference Laboratory, Clinical Reference Laboratory Inc. , Lenexa, Kansas, USA.
Thomas N DennyDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Don LockwoodAvioq, Inc. , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
John L SchmitzDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1425-236X
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USDuke Medical Center · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV is an ongoing global epidemic with estimates of more than a million new infections occurring annually. To combat viral spread, continuous innovations in areas including testing and treatment are necessary. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that laboratories follow an HIV testing algorithm that first uses a US Food and Drug Administration approved immunoassay to detect antibodies to HIV-1 or HIV-2 as well as HIV-1 p24 antigen in serum or plasma samples. An initially reactive specimen is tested by a supplemental assay for confirmation and to differentiate antibodies to HIV-1 or HIV-2. There are few Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved supplemental differentiation tests currently available. A multicenter investigation was conducted to determine the clinical performance for two independent versions of the Avioq VioOne HIV Profile Supplemental Assay (Avioq, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC). The performance of both assay versions compared favorably with the performance parameters for the Geenius HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay as published in that assay package insert (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), the current gold standard for HIV supplemental testing. When comparing the two VioOne assays, version 2 (lacking HIV-2 p27 antibody detection) demonstrated improved reproducibility, specificity, and sensitivity as compared to its predecessor. IMPORTANCE We evaluated the reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity data for two versions of the VioOne HIV Profile Supplemental Assay and compared these results back to similar results for the Geenius HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay that are publicly available. Our study concluded that the VioOne HIV Profile Supplemental Assay compared favorably with the Geenius HIV 1/2 Supplemental Assay, thus providing an additional option for clinical laboratories to improve and expand their HIV testing capabilities.

Indexed as

HIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityAlgorithmsHIV-2HIV AntibodiesHIV Core Protein p24HumansReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUnited StatesHIV AntibodiesHIV Core Protein p24Avioqdifferentiation testsHIV antibody differentiationHIV confirmationHIV supplemental assayVioOne

Identifiers

PMID38206000
PMCPMC10865837
OpenAlexW4390743808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.