Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38205894›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Patient perspectives of weight stigma across the cancer continuum: A scoping review.

Nanako Hawley, Jennifer Green, Erica Ahlich, Caitlyn Hauff, Janice Hermer, Meghan B Skiba, Dara L James, Sarah H Nash

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nanako HawleyDepartment of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA.
Jennifer GreenSchool of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Erica AhlichDepartment of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA.
Caitlyn HauffDepartment of Health, Kinesiology, and Sport, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA.
Janice HermerArizona State University Library, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Meghan B SkibaCollege of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2244-5575
Dara L JamesCollege of Nursing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA.
Sarah H NashDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9038-6001
University of South Alabama · USArizona State University · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jon C.D. Houtman · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
DEEP SOUTH TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH MENTORED CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMKL2TR003097 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, KENNETH G · 2019 to 2023
$5.2M
Transdisciplinary Research in Energetics and Cancer (TREC) Training GrantR25CA203650 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI IRWIN, MELINDA L · 2016 to 2025
$2.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003097NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS R25 CA203650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeight stigma has been defined as the social devaluation and denigration of individuals because of their weight. The purpose of this scoping systematic review was to assess and understand patient experiences with weight stigma in the cancer care setting.

methodsWe conducted a systematic scoping review of studies examining shame, prejudice, bias, and stigma in relation to weight and cancer-related care using five databases: PubMed, CINAHL Plus Full Text (ProQuest), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (EBSCO), and Scopus. Articles were uploaded into Covidence for de-duplication and screening. Included studies were peer reviewed, reported adult patient experiences in cancer-related care, and were published in English between October 2012 and February 2023. Study characteristics and key findings were abstracted and qualitatively synthesized.

resultsPublications meeting inclusion criteria yielded five studies (n = 113 participants). Most focused on the experiences of women (n = 4) and cancers which predominantly impact women (i.e., breast, cervical, endometrial; n = 4). All stages of the cancer continuum were included with studies examining screening (n = 2), treatment (n = 1), and post-treatment survivorship (n = 2). Weight discrimination was discussed in four studies and weight-biased stereotypes were discussed in three studies. Experiences of weight bias internalization were reported in four studies. One study described an instance of implicit weight bias.

conclusionsLimited studies examine patient experiences of weight stigma in cancer care; however, current evidence suggests that patients do experience weight stigma in cancer-related care. This review highlights critical gaps and a need for more research on the prevalence and impact of weight stigma in cancer screening and care.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsWeight PrejudiceFemaleHumansSocial Stigmadiscriminationhealth disparityobesityoncologyweight biasweight stigma

Identifiers

PMID38205894
PMCPMC10905240
OpenAlexW4390744159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.