Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38205736›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cutaneous medicine and surgery

Teledermatology in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review.

Luvneet Verma, Tarek Turk, Liz Dennett, Marlene Dytoc

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07009483 (Effectiveness of Psychodermatologic Educational Modules on Atopic Dermatitis Patient Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07009483 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of Psychodermatologic Educational Modules on Atopic Dermatitis Patient Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsAtopic Dermatitis (AD)ArmsPatient education modules providing information on the psychological aspects of atopic dermatitis treatment and management.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Luvneet VermaDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-7302-6029
Tarek TurkDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Liz DennettSperber Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Marlene DytocDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine use has been increasing especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Various studies have outlined benefits of telemedicine including improving health equity, reducing wait times, and cost-effectiveness. Skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD) may potentially be managed via telemedicine. However, there are no evidence-based recommendations for best practices in telemedicine for assessing AD patients. The objective of this review is to assess and summarize current evidence on telemedicine modalities for AD. This review will assess patient outcomes from various telemedicine models for AD. A review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Two reviewers independently screened potential studies and extracted data. Studies were included if they evaluated any telemedicine assessment for AD. Of 2719 identified records, 5 reports were included. Two reports used the direct-access online model, 1 used web-based consultation, 1 used e-health through a personal eczema portal, and 1 used an online platform and mobile application. All models were variations of the asynchronous, store and forward model. In all the included reports, teledermatology for the follow-up of patients with AD was effective and equivalent when compared to in-person appointments or standard treatment for their respective key outcome measures. However, it is unclear what the most effective teledermatology model is due to significant heterogeneity between studies. Teledermatology may serve as an important tool for triaging and follow-up of patients with AD. More studies are needed to determine which teledermatology models are most effective for virtual assessment of AD.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicDermatologyTelemedicineCOVID-19Humansatopic dermatitisdermatitiseczemateledermatologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38205736
PMCPMC11015705
OpenAlexW4390741266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.