ArticleCureus2023
Dietary Consumption With Vitamin D Status Among Pregnant Women: A Descriptive-Analytic Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mediation of Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index and Dietary Patterns with Relation to Vitamin D and Erythropoiesis-Related Micronutrients in Pregnant Women.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to investigate the relationship between vitamin D status and diet between pregnant and non-pregnant women who attended a Maternity Teaching Hospital (MTH) in Sulaymaniyah, Iraq. MATERIALS AND
methodsA descriptive-analytic (cross-sectional) study was conducted at the MTH in Sulaymaniyah, Iraq. Data was collected from January to October 2022, including demographics, obstetric information, and dietary data. Vitamin D levels were measured using the Roche Elecsys assay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States). The non-pregnant group consisted of women who were not pregnant at the time of this study, and the pregnant group had women with second trimester pregnancy at the time of enrollment.
resultThe study revealed a significant prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women. In the study, pregnant participants (56.0% aged 30-39) and non-pregnant participants (54.3% aged 20-29) had similar ages (p>0.05). Both groups mostly had overweight individuals, with pregnant participants having a slightly higher mean body mass index (BMI). While vitamin D deficiency was more prevalent among pregnant women, the differences were not statistically significant. Notably, higher dairy intake was positively associated with higher vitamin D levels. Urban residency was common in both groups. Dietary habits were mostly similar, except for tea consumption (p<0.05), with non-tea drinkers having higher vitamin D levels. However, dietary patterns did not strongly correlate with vitamin D levels in the non-pregnant group.
conclusionThis study reveals a significant prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women, although the differences between pregnant and non-pregnant groups were not statistically significant. The positive association between higher dairy intake and increased vitamin D levels underscores the potential impact of dietary choices on vitamin D status during pregnancy. However, the study also suggests that dietary patterns alone may not strongly correlate with vitamin D levels in non-pregnant women. Overall, this highlights the importance of addressing vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women and underscores the need for personalized dietary guidance, taking into account individual preferences and habits to promote better maternal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.