Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38205276›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2023

3D wrist imaging - Is it time for superman to retire?

Svea Deppe Mørup, Bo Mussmann, Malene Roland Vils Pedersen, Lykke Moseholm Rasumssen, Katrine Gaarde, Janni Jensen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Svea Deppe MørupDepartment of Radiology, Sygehus lillebælt, Middelfart, Denmark.
Bo MussmannDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2119-5129
Malene Roland Vils PedersenDepartment of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5167-7968
Lykke Moseholm RasumssenHealth Sciences Research Centre, University College Lilleaelt, Odense, Denmark.
Katrine GaardeHealth Sciences Research Centre, University College Lilleaelt, Odense, Denmark.
Janni JensenResearch and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
University College Lillebaelt · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKLillebaelt Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Computed tomography (CT) of the wrist may be challenged, due to patients' inability to extend the arm for a "Superman pose" resulting in increased radiation dose due to scatter. Alternative positions and less dose administering modalities such as 3D Cone-beam CT (CBCT) and single-shot CT could be considered. This phantom study aimed to estimate scatter radiation dose in different phantom positions using helical and single-shot CT and 3D CBCT. Material and Methods: Wireless electronic dosimeters attached to the head and chest of an anthropomorphic phantom in various clinically relevant positions were used to measure scatter radiation. In helical CT, the following positions were used: Superman pose, semi-superman pose, wrist on the abdomen, and single-shot CT with the patient sitting in front of and behind the gantry. In 3D CBCT, the phantom was in a supine position with the arm extended laterally. Results: Helical CT using the Superman pose resulted in a total scattered radiation dose of 64.8 µGy. The highest total dose (269.7 µGy) was obtained with the wrist positioned on the abdomen while the lowest total dose was achieved in single-shot CT with the phantom sitting behind the gantry with the forearm placed inside the gantry (3.2 µGy). The total dose in 3D CBCT was 171.1 µGy. Conclusion: The commonly used semi-superman and wrist-on-abdomen positions in CT administer the highest scattered doses and should be avoided when either single-shot CT or 3D CBCT is available. Radiographers should carefully consider alternatives when a patient referred for wrist CT cannot comply with the Superman position.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyCone-beam computed tomographyDistal radiusFractureRadiation doseRadiography

Identifiers

PMID38205276
PMCPMC10778063
OpenAlexW4390271744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.