Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38205243›Full record

ReviewiScience2024

Citizen science is a vital partnership for invasive alien species management and research.

Michael J O Pocock, Tim Adriaens, Sandro Bertolino, René Eschen, Franz Essl, Philip E Hulme, Jonathan M Jeschke, Helen E Roy, Heliana Teixeira, Maarten de Groot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The spread of non-native species.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Overcoming barriers to build partnerships for managing plant invasions under global change.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Citizen science powers wetland restoration.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Population Dynamics of the Exotic FlatwormEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  17. Emerging technologies in citizen science and potential for insect monitoring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael J O PocockUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Tim AdriaensResearch Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Brussels, Belgium.
Sandro BertolinoDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
René EschenCABI, Delémont, Switzerland.
Franz EsslDivision of BioInvasions, Global Change & Macroecology, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philip E HulmeBioprotection Aotearoa, Department of Pest Management and Conservation, Lincoln University, PO Box 84850, Christchurch, Lincoln 7648, New Zealand.
Jonathan M JeschkeLeibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany.
Helen E RoyUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Heliana TeixeiraCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
Maarten de GrootSlovenian Forestry Institute, Večna pot 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive alien species (IAS) adversely impact biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and socio-economics. Citizen science can be an effective tool for IAS surveillance, management, and research, providing large datasets over wide spatial extents and long time periods, with public participants generating knowledge that supports action. We demonstrate how citizen science has contributed knowledge across the biological invasion process, especially for early detection and distribution mapping. However, we recommend that citizen science could be used more for assessing impacts and evaluating the success of IAS management. Citizen science does have limitations, and we explore solutions to two key challenges: ensuring data accuracy and dealing with uneven spatial coverage of potential recorders (which limits the dataset's "fit for purpose"). Greater co-development of citizen science with public stakeholders will help us better realize its potential across the biological invasion process and across ecosystems globally while meeting the needs of participants, local communities, scientists, and decision-makers.

Indexed as

EcologyNatural sciencesNature conservation

Identifiers

PMID38205243
PMCPMC10776933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.