Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38205231›Full record

ArticleGenetics research2024

Morphological, Biochemical, and Molecular Diversity Assessment of Egyptian Bottle Gourd Cultivars.

Ehab A Ibrahim, Haifa A S Alhaithloul, Sahar A M Shamseldin, Sara B H Awaly, Abd El-Latif Hesham, Mohamed F M Abdelkader, Mesfer M Alqahtani, Fahad Mohammed Alzuaibr, Abdulrahman Alasmari, Noha A Sukar and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ehab A IbrahimDepartment of Cross-Pollinated Vegetable Research, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza 12619, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-1001-2673
Haifa A S AlhaithloulBiology Department, College of Science, Jouf University, Sakaka 2014, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0006-5418-1224
Sahar A M ShamseldinBotany Department, Women's College for Arts, Science and Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt.
Sara B H AwalyGenetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-8178
Abd El-Latif HeshamGenetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef 62521, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0614-7658
Mohamed F M AbdelkaderDepartment of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0494-2340
Mesfer M AlqahtaniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Humanities, Shaqra University, P.O. Box 1040, Ad-Dawadimi, Shaqra 11911, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2191-0233
Fahad Mohammed AlzuaibrBiology Department, College of Science, Tabuk University, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9975-1028
Abdulrahman AlasmariBiology Department, College of Science, Tabuk University, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1212-8581
Noha A SukarAgricultural Botany (Genetics) Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Girls), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-5989-1723
Mohamed Z DiyastyGenetic Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt.
Mohamed A AbdeinSeeds Development Department, El-Nada Misr Scientific Research and Development Projects, Turrell, Mansoura 35511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8922-6089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic variability and relationships between ten bottle gourd cultivars were evaluated based on morphological, biochemical, and molecular parameters. The results displayed high variability among selected cultivars in terms of photosynthetic pigments, total free amino acids, total phenol content, isozymes pattern, and protein electrophoresis. Furthermore, differences in molecular markers were revealed by the SCoT technique. The peroxidase (POD) and polyphenyl oxidase (PPO) isozymes patterns did not detect significant differences in bands among cultivars. The protein patterns revealed seventeen bands ranging from 126 to 9 kDa and five polymorphic bands representing 29.41%. On the other hand, eight SCoT primers were used to evaluate the genetic variability and relationships between the ten Egyptian bottle gourd cultivars. The results of SCoT analysis detected 44 amplicons with 50% polymorphism. In addition, the results of the phylogenetic tree that is constructed based on the similarity coefficient revealed by SCoT analysis confirm the results of biochemical analysis indicating a genetic relationship between the most efficient bottle gourd cultivars (S1 and S2 cultivars). In addition, there is a genetic relationship among the less efficient bottle gourd cultivars (S4 and S5 cultivars). These results could be beneficial to distinguish among bottle gourd cultivars in the plant breeding programs.

Indexed as

CucurbitaIsoenzymesAmino AcidsEgyptHumansPhylogenyPlant BreedingAmino AcidsIsoenzymes

Identifiers

PMID38205231
PMCPMC10781529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.