ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2024
Drug-related problems identified by clinical pharmacists in an academic medical centre in Thailand.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug-related problems and their predictors in pediatric community-acquired infections: the role of pharmacist-led interventions in Pakistan.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026Article
- Drug-therapy-related problems and pharmacist interventions in the medical ward in northeast Ethiopia: focus on types, acceptability, and impacts.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Ethical interventions: revisiting the assessment tools for health-system pharmacists.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of drug-related problems among breast cancer patients in a cancer specialty center in Nepal.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development of an innovative clinical pharmacy service in a urology surgical unit: a new initiative from Qatar.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are important issues that interfere with therapeutic outcomes and can cause adverse events. Pharmacists play a vital role in identifying and resolving DRPs. This study aimed to determine the characteristics, and severity of DPRs, including clinical pharmacists' interventions. Method: A retrospective study was conducted at Ramathibodi Hospital, a tertiary university hospital in Thailand. We collected data from the drug-related problem system and the electronic medical record. Descriptive statistics were performed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 18.0. Results: There were 580 patients (20.44%) who had at least one DRP. We classified 1255 DRPs based on Cipolle-Strand-Morley Criteria 2012. The most common DRPs were the need for additional drug therapy (27.09%), followed by dosage too low (26.93%) and dosage too high (22.31%). Anti-infective agents (23.71%) and omeprazole (2.70%) were the most common drug groups and drugs causing DRPs, respectively. The severity of DRPs was mostly categorised to be 'no harm' (95.46%). Almost all of the interventions were completely accepted by physicians (99.12%). Conclusion: The most common DRPs were the need for additional drug therapy and dosage adjustment of antimicrobial agents. The clinical pharmacists on wards are effective in preventing and resolving DRPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.