ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Comparative before-after study of fever prevention versus targeted temperature management following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: International guidelines for neuroprotection following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) recommend fever prevention ahead of routine temperature management. This study aimed to identify any effect of changing from targeted temperature management to fever prevention on neurological outcome following OHCA. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted of consecutive admissions to an ICU at a tertiary OHCA centre. Comparison was made between a period of protocolised targeted temperature management (TTM) to 36 °C and a period of fever prevention. Results: Data were available for 183 patients. Active temperature management was administered in 86/118 (72%) of the TTM cohort and 20/65 (31%) of the fever prevention group. The median highest temperature prior to the start of temperature management was significantly lower in the TTM group at 35.6 (IQR 34.9-36.2) compared to 37.9 °C (IQR 37.7-38.2) in the fever prevention group (adjusted p < 0.001).There was no difference in the proportion of patients discharged with Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 between the groups (42% vs. 40%, p = 0.88). Patients in the fever prevention group required a reduced duration of noradrenaline (36 vs. 46 h, p = 0.03) and a trend towards a reduced duration of propofol (37 vs. 56 h, p = 0.06).In unadjusted analysis, use of active temperature management (irrespective of group) appeared to be associated with decreased risk of poor outcome (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.78) but after adjustment for patient age, presenting rhythm, witnessed arrest and duration of CPR, this was no longer significant (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.37-2.31, p = 0.88). Conclusion: Switching from TTM to fever prevention following OHCA was associated with similar rates of neurological outcomes, with a possible decrease in sedation and vasopressor requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.