Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38205099›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2024

Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping: A Major Review.

Mohammad-Ali Abtahi, Amir Hushang Beheshtnejad, Golshan Latifi, Marjan Akbari-Kamrani, Sadegh Ghafarian, Ahmad Masoomi, Seyed Ali Sonbolastan, Hamidreaza Jahanbani-Ardakani, Mehrnaz Atighechian, Laleh Banan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of contact lens correction on wavefront aberrations and vision quality in keratoconus.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad-Ali AbtahiFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-8446
Amir Hushang BeheshtnejadFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Golshan LatifiFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Marjan Akbari-KamraniFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sadegh GhafarianFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad MasoomiFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Ali SonbolastanFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamidreaza Jahanbani-ArdakaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehrnaz AtighechianFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Laleh BananSunshine Coast University Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Hosein NouriOphthalmic Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1808-0443
Seyed-Hossein AbtahiOphthalmic Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1459-6752
Farabi Hospital · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRSunshine Coast University Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The corneal epithelium (CE) is the outermost layer of the cornea with constant turnover, relative stability, remarkable plasticity, and compensatory properties to mask alterations in the underlying stroma. The advent of quantitative imaging modalities capable of producing epithelial thickness mapping (ETM) has made it possible to characterize better the different patterns of epithelial remodeling. In this comprehensive synthesis, we reviewed all available data on ETM with different methods, including very high-frequency ultrasound (VHF-US) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in normal individuals, corneal or systemic diseases, and corneal surgical scenarios. We excluded OCT studies that manually measured the corneal epithelial thickness (CET) (e.g., by digital calipers) or the CE (e.g., by confocal scanning or handheld pachymeters). A comparison of different CET measuring technologies and devices capable of producing thickness maps is provided. Normative data on CET and the possible effects of gender, aging, diurnal changes, refraction, and intraocular pressure are discussed. We also reviewed ETM data in several corneal disorders, including keratoconus, corneal dystrophies, recurrent epithelial erosion, herpes keratitis, keratoplasty, bullous keratopathy, carcinoma in situ, pterygium, and limbal stem cell deficiency. The available data on the potential role of ETM in indicating refractive surgeries, planning the procedure, and assessing postoperative changes are reviewed. Alterations in ETM in systemic and ocular conditions such as eyelid abnormalities and dry eye disease and the effects of contact lenses, topical medications, and cataract surgery on the ETM profile are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID38205099
PMCPMC10776199
OpenAlexW4390491814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.