Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38205044›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2024

Intrathecal Therapy Options for Meningeal Carcinomatosis.

Madeleine Marowsky, Volkmar Müller, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Kerstin Riecke, Isabell Witzel, Elena Laakmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Madeleine MarowskyKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Volkmar MüllerKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Barbara SchmalfeldtKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Kerstin RieckeKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Isabell WitzelKlinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Elena LaakmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 5 percent of all patients with metastatic breast cancer go on to develop distant metastases in the meninges, also known as meningeal carcinomatosis. The median survival of these patients is between 3.5 and 4.5 months. Current treatment approaches are based on radiotherapy, systemic and intrathecal therapy. Methotrexate, liposomal cytarabine and trastuzumab are the most common substances used for intrathecal therapy. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of these intrathecal therapy options for meningeal carcinomatosis. A systematic search of the literature was carried out in PubMed using the following search terms: "meningeal metastases", "meningeal carcinomatosis", "leptomeningeal metastasis", "leptomeningeal carcinomatosis", "leptomeningeal disease", "breast cancer", "MTX", "methotrexate", "DepoCyte", "liposomal cytarabine", "trastuzumab" and "anti-HER2". This search resulted in 75 potentially relevant studies, 11 of which were included in this review after meeting the previously determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies differ considerably with regards to study design, cohort size, and dosages of administered drugs. In principle, intrathecal therapy has a tolerable side-effects profile and offers promising results in terms of the median overall survival following treatment with trastuzumab for HER2-positive primary tumors. The focus when treating meningeal carcinomatosis must be on providing a multimodal individual therapeutic approach. However, comprehensive studies which compare the efficacy and side effects of individual pharmaceuticals are lacking. Because of the poor prognosis associated with meningeal carcinomatosis, an approach which treats only the symptoms (best supportive care) should always be considered and discussed with affected patients.

Indexed as

cytarabineintrathecal therapymeningeal carcinomatosismethotrexatetrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID38205044
PMCPMC10781578
OpenAlexW4388485357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.