Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204978›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

National cross-sectional survey on psychological impact on French nursing homes of the first lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic as observed by psychologists, psychomotor, and occupational therapists.

Anne-Julie Vaillant-Ciszewicz, Bérengère Couturier, Lauriane Segaux, Florence Canouï-Poitrine, Olivier Guérin, Sylvie Bonin-Guillaume

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Julie Vaillant-CiszewiczCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Bérengère CouturierUniversité Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.
Lauriane SegauxUniversité Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.
Florence Canouï-PoitrineUniversité Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Créteil, France.
Olivier GuérinCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Pôle Réhabilitation Autonomie et Vieillisssement, Université Côte d'Azur, Inserm U1081, CNR UMR 7284, Nice, France.
Sylvie Bonin-GuillaumeCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Pôle Réhabilitation Autonomie et Vieillisssement, Université Côte d'Azur, Inserm U1081, CNR UMR 7284, Nice, France.
Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCognition Behaviour Technology · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The main objective was to explore the psychological impact of the French lockdown during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on nursing home residents, their relatives, and healthcare teams, as observed by mental health professionals. Design: A national online cross-sectional survey was conducted from May 11 to June 9, 2020. Setting and participants: Respondents were psychologists, psychomotor therapists, and occupational therapists (mental health professionals). Results: A total of 1,062 participants responded to the survey, encompassing 59.8% psychologists, 29.2% occupational therapists, and 11% psychomotor therapists. All mental health professionals felt fear (76.1%), fatigue and exhaustion (84.5%), and inability to manage the emotional burden (78.4%). In nursing homes with COVID-19 cases, residents felt significantly sadder (83.2%), more anxious (65.0%), experienced more anorexia (53.6%), resurgence of traumatic war memories (40.2%), and were more often disoriented (75.7%). The suffering of relatives did not vary between nursing homes with and without COVID-19 cases. The nursing staff was heavily impacted emotionally and was in need of psychological support particularly when working in nursing homes in a low COVID-19 spread zone with COVID-19 cases (41.8 vs. 34.6%). Conclusion and implications: Primary prevention must be implemented to limit the psychological consequences in the event of a new crisis and to prevent the risk of psychological decompensation of residents and teams in nursing homes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Occupational TherapistsCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNursing HomesPandemicsCOVID-19 pandemicfamilieshealth professionalslockdownnursing homespsychological impactresidents

Identifiers

PMID38204978
PMCPMC10778814
OpenAlexW4390274927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.