Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204964›Full record

ReviewThe Japanese dental science review2024

Salivary biomarkers for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and head/neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Shahnawaz Khijmatgar, Josh Yong, Nicole Rübsamen, Felice Lorusso, Pooja Rai, Niccolo Cenzato, Franscesca Gaffuri, Massimo Del Fabbro, Gianluca Martino Tartaglia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Japanese dental science review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inhibition of the EP300/Notch Signaling Pathway Regulates Proliferation and Apoptosis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Article
  11. Fragmented Thresholds, Unified Vision: Advancing Salivary Diagnostics for OSCC and OPMD.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Article
  12. Effect of Indirect Co-Culture With Gingival Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Cytokine Secretion in Primary Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Shahnawaz KhijmatgarSC Chirurgia Maxillo-Facciale e Odontostomatologia, Fondazione Ca'Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy.
Josh YongDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.
Nicole RübsamenInstitute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Germany.
Felice LorussoUniversità degli Studi G. d'Annunzio Chieti - Pescara: Chieti, Abruzzi, Italy.
Pooja RaiDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.
Niccolo CenzatoDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.
Franscesca GaffuriDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.
Massimo Del FabbroDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.
Gianluca Martino TartagliaDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITHarvard University · USUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral cancer became a very common condition. WHO estimates that there are 4 cases of lip and oral cavity cancer for every 100,000 people worldwide. The early diagnosis of cancers is currently a top focus in the health sector. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have identified promising biomarkers for early detection in several original research investigations. However, it is still unclear the quality of these evidence and which biomarker performs the best in terms of early detection. Therefore, the objective was, to map the methodological and reporting quality of available oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or head/neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Secondly, to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of salivary biomarkers for common craniofacial cancers and to compare the diagnostic value of different salivary biomarkers. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases were used to map the methodological and reporting quality of the systematic reviews and meta-analysis conducted on the HNSCC, OSCC using the AMSTAR-2 checklist. The inclusion criteria were systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in the topic of HNSCC and OSCC biomarkers. Exclusion criteria were no animal studies; original primary studies, due to limitation of competency in other languages articles with language other than English were excluded. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for salivary biomarkers and ranked according to network meta-analysis principles. A total of N = 5893 patients were included from four meta-analysis studies. All together, these included n = 37 primary studies. n = 94 biomarkers were pooled from these four meta-analyses and categorised into the stages at which they were detected (I-IV). In OSCC, Chemerin and MMP-9 displayed the highest sensitivity, registering 0.94 (95% CI 0.78, 1.00) and a balanced accuracy of 0.93. Phytosphingosine closely followed, with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.68, 0.99) and a balanced accuracy of 0.87. For HNSCC, the top three biomarkers are Actin, IL-1β Singleplex, and IL-8 ELISA. Actin leads with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.68-0.99), a specificity of 0.67, and an overall accuracy of 0.79. Subsequently, IL-1β Singleplex exhibits a sensitivity of 0.62 (95% CI 0.30-0.88), a specificity of 0.89, and an accuracy of 0.75, followed by IL-8 ELISA with a sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.54-0.97), a specificity of 0.59, and an accuracy of 0.70. In conclusion, there was highest sensitivity for MMP-9 and chemerin salivary biomarkers. There is need of further more studies to identify biomarkers for HNSCC and OSCC.

Indexed as

BiologicalBiomarkerCancersHead and neck squamous cell carcinomaHNSCCMarkerMouthNetwork meta-analysisNMAOral cancerOral neoplasmOSCCSaliva

Identifiers

PMID38204964
PMCPMC10776379
OpenAlexW4390055201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.