ArticleF&S reports2023
Exploratory cohort study into underlying mechanism of differences in estrogen metabolism between Asian and Caucasian women during assisted reproductive technology treatment.
Article in F&S reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Explore whether racial differences in prevalence of CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism underlies estrogen metabolism differences among Asians and Caucasians. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: University-based fertility practice. Patients: Asian or Caucasian patients who underwent ovarian stimulation (OS) or programmed cycle frozen embryo transfer (FET) between October 2019 and April 2021. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Trigger-day serum E2 per oocyte retrieved in OS cycles, and E2 on day of lining check in FET cycles. Results: Seventy-one participants were enrolled, 55 in OS group (29 Caucasian and 26 Asian) and 16 in FET group (10 Caucasian and 6 Asian). Peak E2 per oocyte retrieved in the OS group (n = 48) differed by race, with significantly lower levels in Caucasians compared with Asians (177.5 ± 64.2 vs. 261.1 ± 139.5 pg/mL). Prevalence of CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism did not significantly differ by race. Compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, peak E2 per oocyte retrieved did not differ by CYP1A2∗1F genotype. In multivariate linear regression model, adjusting for body mass index, caffeine intake, and self-reported race, there remained no significant correlation. In FET group, serum E2 on day of lining check was also not significantly different by CYP1A2∗1F genotype. Conclusions: Although a consistent difference in serum E2 between Asians and Caucasians undergoing OS was noted, the CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism is unlikely the primary driver of this difference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.