ArticleRadiology case reports2024
A case report of a giant bladder stone (12 × 8 cm, 610 g).
Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Giant Bladder Calculus Presenting as A Rare Cause of Renal Impairment in A Young Adult with Substance Use Disorder.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2026Article
- Giant Vesicle Calculus Presenting With Azotemia and Hydroureteronephrosis: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Neglected giant bladder stone with bilateral ureteral stones: A case report of staged surgical treatment.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Cable Wire as a Nidus for Vesicolithiasis: A Case Report.Research and reports in urology · 2025Article
- Giant pyonephrosis related to nephrolithiasis in diabetes woman: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder lithiasis is common in developing countries. It has become rare in industrialized countries and exceptional in the absence of associated lower tract pathology. usually caused by urinary tract infections, urethral obstruction or the presence of intravesical foreign bodies. Open cystolithotomy was performed on a 45-year-old patient with lower abdominal pain, moderate dysuria, pollakiuria, nocturia, and hematuria for a long time. A stone of 12 × 8cm in size and approximately 620 grams in weight was removed. The cystoscopy was performed without any infravesical obstruction during the operation. The stone analysis showed 21% struvite and 79% carbonate apatite. Bladder lithiasis is common in Morocco. However, giant lithiasis is rare and is the consequence of neglected voiding disorders. Open cystolithotomy remains the most treatment in the management of giant stones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.