Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204928›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024

Does the Healthy China 2030 Policy Improve People's Health? Empirical Evidence Based on the Difference-in-Differences Approach.

Chuanlin Ning, Huacheng Pei, Youjia Huang, Sichen Li, Yiling Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Re-Engagement in Physical Activity Slows the Decline in Older Adults' Well-Being - A Longitudinal Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chuanlin NingSchool of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5545-4910
Huacheng PeiSchool of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4023-9481
Youjia HuangSchool of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7657-6650
Sichen LiSchool of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8005-5017
Yiling ShaoSchool of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9966-9737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Healthy China 2030 (HC2030) policy is currently recognized as China's most significant and influential national health policy. However, despite its implementation in 2016, the policy's impact has yet to be comprehensively evaluated, particularly in relation to its effectiveness in enhancing population health and promoting public health equity. Methods: We utilized the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) method to evaluate the impact of the HC2030. Our analysis utilized a panel dataset derived from five longitudinal surveys conducted by the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Results: The implementation of HC2030 has improved the overall health status of residents, particularly in urban areas and the western and eastern regions. Mechanistic analysis has further unveiled that the policy's beneficial impact on health outcomes is attributed to a rise in physical activity frequency and the betterment of mental health. Additionally, female, married, and medically insured individuals have demonstrated a significant positive impact of the policy on their health outcomes. Conclusion: Although the HC2030 appears to have effectively improved overall population health, it needs to promote equity in public health adequately. The study suggests adjustments are needed to address the unequal distribution of health outcomes between urban and rural areas and among different regions.

Indexed as

health China 2030health communicationhealth equityhealth policypolicy evaluationpublic health

Identifiers

PMID38204928
PMCPMC10778192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.