Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204918›Full record

ReviewNorth American Spine Society journal2024

Chemical prophylaxis and venous thromboembolism following elective spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Roman Rahmani, Samuel Eaddy, Samuel D Stegelmann, Gabriel Skrobot, Thomas Andreshak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in North American Spine Society journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roman RahmaniMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United States.
Samuel EaddyMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United States.
Samuel D StegelmannHCA Medical City Healthcare UNT-TCU GME (Denton), 3535 S Interstate 35, Denton, TX 76210, United States.
Gabriel SkrobotMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United States.
Thomas AndreshakMercy Health St. Vincent Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, 2409 Cherry St, Suite #10, Toledo, OH 43608, United States.
Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a potentially devastating complication after surgery. Spine surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding, such as spinal epidural hematomas (SEH), which complicates the use of anticoagulation. Despite this dilemma, there is a lack of consensus around perioperative VTE prophylaxis. This systematic review investigates the relationship between chemoprophylaxis and the incidence rates of VTE and SEH in the elective spine surgical population. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify studies published after 2,000 that compared VTE chemoprophylaxis use in elective spine surgery. Studies involving patients aged < 18 years or with known trauma, cancer, or spinal cord injuries were excluded. Pooled incidence rates of VTE and SEH were calculated for all eligible studies, and meta-analyses were performed to assess the relationship between chemoprophylaxis and the incidences of VTE and SEH. Results: Nineteen studies met our eligibility criteria, comprising a total of 220,932 patients. The overall pooled incidence of VTE was 3.2%, including 3.3% for DVT and 0.4% for PE. A comparison of VTE incidence between patients that did and did not receive chemoprophylaxis was not statistically significant (OR 0.97, p=.95, 95% CI 0.43-2.19). The overall pooled incidence of SEH was 0.4%, and there was also no significant difference between patients that did and did not receive chemoprophylaxis (OR 1.57, p=.06, 95% CI 0.99-2.50). Conclusions: The use of perioperative chemoprophylaxis may not significantly alter rates of VTE or SEH in the elective spine surgery population. This review highlights the need for additional randomized controlled trials to better define the risks and benefits of specific chemoprophylactic protocols in various subpopulations of elective spine surgery.

Indexed as

AnticoagulationChemoprophylaxisDeep vein thrombosisElectivePulmonary embolismSpinal epidural hematomaSpine surgeryThromboprophylaxisThrombosisVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID38204918
PMCPMC10777073
OpenAlexW4388948610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.