ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
In-stent restenosis in acute coronary syndrome-a classic and a machine learning approach.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk prediction model for in-stent restenosis following PCI: a systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Utility of artificial intelligence in predicting clinical outcomes of angiographic procedures: a comprehensive scoping review.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of in-stent restenosis in patients presenting with acute and chronic coronary syndrome.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- From Mechanisms to Management: Tackling In-Stent Restenosis in the Drug-Eluting Stent Era.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Research progress on risk factors for in-stent restenosis following cerebrovascular stent implantation.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Predictive value of combined MHR and Lp(a) for in-stent restenosis in coronary heart disease patients: a study based on GEE model.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of acupuncture and exercise rehabilitation on quality of life in acute coronary syndrome patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a number of previous studies tried to identify the risk factors that are most likely to influence the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR), but the contribution of these factors to ISR is not clearly defined. Thus, the need for a better way of identifying the independent predictors of ISR, which comes in the form of Machine Learning (ML). Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between ISR and risk factors associated with ACS and to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of ISR through the use of ML in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Consecutive patients presenting with ACS who were successfully treated with PCI and who had an angiographic follow-up after at least 3 months were included in the study. ISR risk factors considered into the study were demographic, clinical and peri-procedural angiographic lesion risk factors. We explored four ML techniques (Random Forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), simple linear logistic regression (LLR) and deep neural network (DNN)) to predict the risk of ISR. Overall, 21 features were selected as input variables for the ML algorithms, including continuous, categorical and binary variables. Results: The total cohort of subjects included 340 subjects, in which the incidence of ISR observed was 17.68% ( Conclusion: ML models applied in patients after PCI can contribute to a better differentiation of the future risk of ISR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.