Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204793›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Instructing somebody else to act: motor co-representations in the instructor.

Mathias Van der Biest, Rebecca Pedinoff, Frederick Verbruggen, Marcel Brass, Anna K Kuhlen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathias Van der BiestDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0287-4767
Rebecca PedinoffBerlin School of Mind and Brain/ Department of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Frederick VerbruggenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7958-0719
Marcel BrassBerlin School of Mind and Brain/ Department of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anna K KuhlenInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8834-0592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instructions enable humans to perform novel tasks quickly. This is achieved by creating and activating the instruction representation for upcoming tasks, which can then modulate ongoing task behaviour in an almost 'reflexive' manner, an effect called instruction-based reflexivity. While most research has focused on understanding how verbal instructions are represented within the 'instructed' (i.e. the person receiving instructions), here we focus on how the instructor's (i.e. the person giving instructions) behaviour is affected through instructing. In a series of three experiments and one pooled analysis, we extended the classical instruction-based reflexivity paradigm to a novel social variant in which the instructions are given by an instructor (rather than visual computer-generated instructions). We found an instruction-based reflexivity effect for the instructor, that is, the instructor's task performance was better on congruent compared to incongruent trials (i.e. Experiments 1 and 2, pooled analysis). This suggests that the instructor represents the instructions of the instructed in an action-oriented format. However, this did not depend on the specific task of the instructed (i.e. Experiment 1), nor is it exclusively social (i.e. Experiment 3).

Indexed as

instructinginstruction-based reflexivitymotor representationssocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID38204793
PMCPMC10776225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.