Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204763›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2023

Temporal Uncertainty Localization to Enable Human-in-the-Loop Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac MRI Datasets.

Dilek M Yalcinkaya, Khalid Youssef, Bobak Heydari, Orlando Simonetti, Rohan Dharmakumar, Subha Raman, Behzad Sharif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Improved robustness for deep learning-based segmentation of multi-center myocardial perfusion cardiovascular MRI datasets using data-adaptive uncertainty-guided space-time analysis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dilek M YalcinkayaLaboratory for Translational Imaging of Microcirculation, Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM), Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Khalid YoussefLaboratory for Translational Imaging of Microcirculation, Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM), Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Bobak HeydariStephenson Cardiac Imaging Centre, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Orlando SimonettiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rohan DharmakumarKrannert Cardiovascular Research Center, IUSM/IU Health Cardiovascular Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Subha RamanKrannert Cardiovascular Research Center, IUSM/IU Health Cardiovascular Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Behzad SharifLaboratory for Translational Imaging of Microcirculation, Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM), Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

Accurate, Needle-Free, MRI-based Detection of Ischemic Heart Disease without Contrast AgentsR01HL148788 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DHARMAKUMAR, ROHAN · 2020 to 2023
$3.0M
Noninvasive Testing of Coronary Microvascular Reactivity Using High-resolution Free-breathing MRIR01HL153430 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHARIF, BEHZAD · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148788NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is a widely used modality for diagnosing myocardial blood flow (perfusion) abnormalities. During a typical free-breathing DCE-CMRI scan, close to 300 time-resolved images of myocardial perfusion are acquired at various contrast "wash in/out" phases. Manual segmentation of myocardial contours in each time-frame of a DCE image series can be tedious and time-consuming, particularly when non-rigid motion correction has failed or is unavailable. While deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown promise for analyzing DCE-CMRI datasets, a "dynamic quality control" (dQC) technique for reliably detecting failed segmentations is lacking. Here we propose a new space-time uncertainty metric as a dQC tool for DNN-based segmentation of free-breathing DCE-CMRI datasets by validating the proposed metric on an external dataset and establishing a human-in-the-loop framework to improve the segmentation results. In the proposed approach, we referred the top 10% most uncertain segmentations as detected by our dQC tool to the human expert for refinement. This approach resulted in a significant increase in the Dice score (p < 0.001) and a notable decrease in the number of images with failed segmentation (16.2% to 11.3%) whereas the alternative approach of randomly selecting the same number of segmentations for human referral did not achieve any significant improvement. Our results suggest that the proposed dQC framework has the potential to accurately identify poor-quality segmentations and may enable efficient DNN-based analysis of DCE-CMRI in a human-in-the-loop pipeline for clinical interpretation and reporting of dynamic CMRI datasets.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular MRIDynamic MRIHuman-in-the-loop A.I.Image SegmentationQuality controlUncertainty Quantification

Identifiers

PMID38204763
PMCPMC10775176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.