ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024
Construction of Hospice Care Evaluation System for Terminally Ill Patients in ICU.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Terminally ill patients can benefit from hospice care, which specifically addresses the needs of patients and families affected by terminal illness. However, there is a lack of standardized evaluation criteria to assess the quality of hospice care for terminally ill patients in the ICU, and it is impossible to evaluate the service quality of hospice care. To use the Delphi method to construct a hospice care system for terminally ill patients in ICU that meets clinical needs, and to provide theoretical support for nursing decision-making of terminally ill patients in clinical ICU. Methods: Obtain relevant literatures by entering specific key words into the database, the hospice care nursing system for terminally ill patients in ICU was preliminarily drawn up by literature analysis, and 24 experts in this field were consulted for 3 rounds by Delphi method to discuss the development status of hospice care and finally establish the hospice care nursing system. Results: In the three rounds of letter inquiries, the positive coefficients of experts were all high, the expert authority coefficient (Cr) were 0.864, 0.849, 0.832, and the expert opinion coordination coefficient(W) were 0.186, 0.319, 0.224; The system includes 8 first-level indicators, 27 second-level indicators and 9 third-level indicators. Conclusion: In this study, three rounds of Delphi consultation methods were used to construct an evaluation index system for the nursing quality of hospice care for ICU patients. The evaluation indicators formulated closely focus on the physiological and psychological characteristics of ICU patients, which can provide a better reference for ICU patients with advanced life in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.