Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204726›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2023

Simulation-based assessment of robotic cardiac surgery skills: An international multicenter, cross-specialty trial.

Gennady V Atroshchenko, Emiliano Navarra, Matthew Valdis, Elena Sandoval, Nasseh Hashemi, Stepan Cerny, Daniel Pereda, Meindert Palmen, Flemming Bjerrum, Niels Henrik Bruun and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05043064 (Validity Evidence for Simulation-based Assessment of Robotic Cardiac Surgical Skills and Examination of Learning Curves in Wet Labs), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05043064 nacompletednot on this map

Validity Evidence for Simulation-based Assessment of Robotic Cardiac Surgical Skills and Examination of Learning Curves in Wet Labs

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg University HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled19ConditionsRobotic Cardiac Surgery SimulationArmsWet lab tasks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Gennady V AtroshchenkoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Emiliano NavarraDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Matthew ValdisDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada.
Elena SandovalDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Nasseh HashemiNordsim, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Stepan CernyDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniel PeredaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Meindert PalmenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Flemming BjerrumDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Niels Henrik BruunUnit of Clinical Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin G TolsgaardCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ESGentofte Hospital · DKHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESLeiden University Medical Center · NLNa Homolce Hospital · CZUniversity of Copenhagen · DKWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the validity of simulation-based assessment of robotic-assisted cardiac surgery skills using a wet lab model, focusing on the use of a time-based score (TBS) and modified Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (mGEARS) score. Methods: We tested 3 wet lab tasks (atrial closure, mitral annular stitches, and internal thoracic artery [ITA] dissection) with both experienced robotic cardiac surgeons and novices from multiple European centers. The tasks were assessed using 2 tools: TBS and mGEARS score. Reliability, internal consistency, and the ability to discriminate between different levels of competence were evaluated. Results: The results demonstrated a high internal consistency for all 3 tasks using mGEARS assessment tool. The mGEARS score and TBS could reliably discriminate between different levels of competence for the atrial closure and mitral stitches tasks but not for the ITA harvesting task. A generalizability study also revealed that it was feasible to assess competency of the atrial closure and mitral stitches tasks using mGEARS but not the ITA dissection task. Pass/fail scores were established for each task using both TBS and mGEARS assessment tools. Conclusions: The study provides sufficient evidence for using TBS and mGEARS scores in evaluating robotic-assisted cardiac surgery skills in wet lab settings for intracardiac tasks. Combining both assessment tools enhances the evaluation of proficiency in robotic cardiac surgery, paving the way for standardized, evidence-based preclinical training and credentialing. Clinical trial registry number: NCT05043064.

Indexed as

assessmentrobotic cardiac surgerysimulationvaliditywet lab

Identifiers

PMID38204726
PMCPMC10775167
OpenAlexW4388248452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.