Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204694›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2023

Development and validation of a digital biomarker predicting acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery on an hourly basis.

Linda Lapp, Marc Roper, Kimberley Kavanagh, Stefan Schraag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda LappDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Marc RoperDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Kimberley KavanaghDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Stefan SchraagDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a digital biomarker for predicting the onset of acute kidney injury (AKI) on an hourly basis up to 24 hours in advance in the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery. Methods: The study analyzed data from 6056 adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and/or valve surgery between April 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018 (development phase, training, and testing) and 3572 patients between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022 (validation phase). The study used 2 dynamic predictive modeling approaches, namely logistic regression and bootstrap aggregated regression trees machine (BARTm), to predict AKI. The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values across all lead times before the occurrence of AKI were reported. The clinical practicality was assessed using calibration. Results: Of all included patients, 8.45% and 16.66% had AKI in the development and validation phases, respectively. When applied to testing data, AKI was predicted with the mean AUC of 0.850 and 0.802 by BARTm and logistic regression, respectively. When applied to validation data, BARTm and LR resulted in a mean AUC of 0.844 and 0.786, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the successful prediction of AKI on an hourly basis up to 24 hours in advance. The digital biomarkers developed and validated in this study have the potential to assist clinicians in optimizing treatment and implementing preventive strategies for patients at risk of developing AKI after cardiac surgery in the intensive care unit.

Indexed as

acute kidney injurybiomarkerscardiac surgeryintensive care unitprediction modelrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID38204694
PMCPMC10775068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.