ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2024
Comparison of Tetrasodium EDTA 4% with Sodium Citrate 4% as Line-Locking Solutions at 2 Tertiary Hemodialysis Centres.
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparison of catheter lock solutions and associated complications in pediatric intestinal failure patients.Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The patency of central venous catheters (CVCs) in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) is maintained by instilling sodium citrate 4% (SC 4%) locking solution. Alteplase, a thrombolytic agent, is administered to restore function if patency is lost. Objective: To compare SC 4% with a new line-locking solution, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 4% (EDTA 4%), in terms of CVC patency and alteplase use. Methods: This retrospective chart review included all HD patients who were switched from SC 4% to EDTA 4% locking solution at 2 tertiary HD centres between June and December 2021. Patients were switched to EDTA 4% if they had high usage of alteplase (receiving ≥ 2 doses of alteplase in a 2-week period). For each line-locking agent, HD pump speeds and alteplase use were analyzed over 2 consecutive 12-week periods. Mean serum calcium and ionized calcium values were recorded during each period. A cost analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 37 HD patients were switched to EDTA 4% during the study period. There was no difference in mean HD pump speed between SC 4% and EDTA 4% (307.7 vs 305.1 mL/min, p = 0.48). The number of catheter-use-days on which alteplase was required declined significantly, from 313 days with SC 4% to 94 days with EDTA 4% (p < 0.001), with an overall cost reduction of 34% ($13 183.21). The decrease in alteplase usage was primarily driven by 1 of the 2 sites. A statistically significant decrease in mean ionized calcium at site 2 (from 1.12 to 1.1 mmol/L, p = 0.037) was noted. As well, an intraluminal interaction between EDTA 4% and serum calcium caused 6 cases of low serum calcium. Conclusions: This study showed that use of EDTA 4% as a line-locking agent reduced alteplase usage in the CVCs of HD patients while maintaining adequate pump speed (i.e., ≥ 300 mL/min).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.