ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2024
Describing and Comparing Patient Factors Associated with Use of Parenteral Iron before and after Implementation of an Order Set for Parenteral Iron (DECODE IRON).
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In select clinical scenarios, IV administration of iron is suitable for management of iron deficiency anemia; however, for most patients, oral administration of iron is the mainstay of treatment. At the Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre, in Red Deer, Alberta, high utilization of IV iron has resulted in limited access to this medication for the treatment of ambulatory patients, as well as significant usage of health care resources. Objectives: The primary objective was to compare patient characteristics, specifically pretreatment laboratory test results and previous use of oral iron, among those receiving IV iron therapy in an ambulatory setting before and after implementation of an iron sucrose order set. For secondary objectives, the aforementioned groups were compared with regard to meeting the diagnostic criteria for iron deficiency anemia, with or without pretreatment oral iron or blood transfusion, and the dosing characteristics for IV iron. Methods: A retrospective electronic chart review was performed for ambulatory patients who received IV iron between January 1, 2020, and January 31, 2022. Results: A total of 436 unique treatment courses were included in the analysis. The following pretreatment laboratory results were observed before and after implementation of the iron sucrose order set: mean hemoglobin 105.8 (standard deviation [SD] 21.9) g/L versus 102.2 (SD 18.5) g/L; mean of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) 82.2 (SD 9.4) fL versus 79.2 (SD 8.9) fL; and median ferritin 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-12) μg/L versus 6 (IQR 4-11) μg/L. Only the difference in MCV values was statistically significant ( Conclusions: The implementation of an iron sucrose order set for ambulatory patients did not have a significant effect on pretreatment laboratory parameters among patients for whom IV iron was prescribed. Further stewardship initiatives could be beneficial in improving the appropriateness of IV iron use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.