Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204442›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2023

Exploring ideal operative time for best outcomes in gastric cancer surgery: A multi-institutional study based on KLASS-07 database.

Shin-Hoo Park, Ye-Rim Shin, Hoon Hur, Chang Min Lee, Jae Seok Min, Seung Wan Ryu, Hyun Dong Chae, Oh Jeong, Chang-In Choi, Kyo-Young Song and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Shin-Hoo ParkDivision of Foregut Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Ye-Rim ShinDivision of Foregut Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Hoon HurDepartment of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea.
Chang Min LeeDivision of Foregut Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan 15355, Republic of Korea.
Jae Seok MinDepartment of Surgery, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Cancer Center, Busan 46033, Republic of Korea.
Seung Wan RyuDepartment of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu 41931, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Dong ChaeDepartment of Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu 42472, Republic of Korea.
Oh JeongDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun 58128, Republic of Korea.
Chang-In ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan 49241, Republic of Korea.
Kyo-Young SongDepartment of Surgery, Catholic University of Seoul St Mary's Hospital, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.
Ho Goon KimDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea.
Ye Seob JeeDepartment of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan 31116, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Hee KimDepartment of Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan 14905, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Goo KimDepartment of Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon 34943, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Sook YangDepartment of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Hua HuangDepartment of Gastric Cancer and Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200433, China.
Sungsoo ParkDivision of Foregut Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: While a rushed operation can omit essential procedures, prolonged operative time results in higher morbidity. Nevertheless, the optimal operative time range remains uncertain. This study aimed to estimate the ideal operative time range and evaluate its applicability in laparoscopic cancer surgery. Methods: A prospectively collected multicenter database of 397 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were retrospectively reviewed. The ideal operative time range was statistically calculated by separately analyzing the operative time of uneventful surgeries. Finally, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared among the shorter, ideal, and longer operative time groups. Results: The statistically calculated ideal operative time was 135.4-165.4 min. The longer operative time (LOT) group had a lower rate of uneventful, perfect surgery than the ideal or shorter operative time (IOT/SOT) group (2.8% Conclusions: Operative time longer than the ideal time range (especially ≥240 min) should be avoided. If the essential operative procedure were faithfully conducted without compromising oncological safety, an operative time shorter than the ideal range leaded to a better prognosis. Efforts to minimize operative time should be attempted with sufficient surgical experience.

Indexed as

gastrectomygastric cancerlaparoscopic surgerymorbidityOperative time

Identifiers

PMID38204442
PMCPMC10774136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.