Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204093›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparison of Additively Manufactured Polymer-Ceramic Parts Obtained via Different Technologies.

Katarzyna Jasik, Janusz Kluczyński, Danuta Miedzińska, Arkadiusz Popławski, Jakub Łuszczek, Justyna Zygmuntowicz, Paulina Piotrkiewicz, Krzysztof Perkowski, Marcin Wachowski, Krzysztof Grzelak

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katarzyna JasikInstitute of Robots & Machine Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Gen. S. Kaliskiego 2 St., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0000-3259-7727
Janusz KluczyńskiInstitute of Robots & Machine Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Gen. S. Kaliskiego 2 St., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6058-965X
Danuta MiedzińskaInstitute of Mechanics and Computational Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Kaliskiego 2 St., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2503-6600
Arkadiusz PopławskiInstitute of Mechanics and Computational Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Kaliskiego 2 St., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7494-8975
Jakub ŁuszczekInstitute of Robots & Machine Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Gen. S. Kaliskiego 2 St., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6441-3881
Justyna ZygmuntowiczFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 141 Woloska St., 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4982-5743
Paulina PiotrkiewiczFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 141 Woloska St., 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8846-902X
Krzysztof PerkowskiŁukasiewicz Research Network, Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, 8 Cementowa Street, 31-983 Krakow, Poland.
Marcin WachowskiInstitute of Robots & Machine Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Gen. S. Kaliskiego 2 St., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6732-5972
Krzysztof GrzelakInstitute of Robots & Machine Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Military University of Technology, Gen. S. Kaliskiego 2 St., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0675-1983

Funding

Military University of Technology in Warsaw 22-830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper aims to compare two ceramic materials available for additive manufacturing (AM) processes-vat photopolymerization (VPP) and material extrusion (MEX)-that result in fully ceramic parts after proper heat treatment. The analysis points out the most significant differences between the structural and mechanical properties and the potential application of each AM technology. The research revealed different behaviors for the specimens obtained via the two mentioned technologies. In the case of MEX, the specimens exhibited similar microstructures before and after heat treatment. The sintering process did not affect the shape of the grains, only their size. For the VPP specimens, directly after the manufacturing process, irregular grain shapes were registered, but after the sintering process, the grains fused, forming a solid structure that made it impossible to outline individual grains and measure their size. The highest compression strength was 168 MPa for the MEX specimens and 81 MPa for the VPP specimens. While the VPP specimens had half the compression strength, the results for the VPP specimens were significantly more repeatable.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingmechanical properties of ceramicsmicrostructural analysis

Identifiers

PMID38204093
PMCPMC10780030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.