ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Research on Compressive Strength of Manufactured Sand Concrete Based on Response Surface Methodology.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of low calcium bentonite on the strength development of recycled aggregate concrete.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting High-Strength Concrete's Compressive Strength: A Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Networks, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System, and Response Surface Methodology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Correction: Gao et al. Research on Compressive Strength of Manufactured Sand Concrete Based on Response Surface Methodology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Research on Compressive Strength of Manufactured Sand Concrete Based on Response Surface Methodology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Optimization Based on Toughness and Splitting Tensile Strength of Steel-Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Incorporating Silica Fume Using Response Surface Method.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the impact of economic and social development on the environment, there is an increasing demand for manufactured sand to replace natural sand as fine aggregate for concrete. At the same time, the effect of admixtures on the rheological properties and compressive strength of concrete is crucial in civil engineering applications. In this study, with the Box-Behnken test model, we analyzed and investigated the impact of a composite admixture of stone powder (SP), pulverized fuel ash (PFA), and silicon fume (SF) on the compressive strength of siliceous manufactured sand concrete using response surface methodology (RSM). At the same time, the rheological properties of the siliceous artificial sand and river sand concrete were analyzed. The prediction of the compressive strength of siliceous artificial sand concrete was developed using multiple regression analysis, the factors of which were SP, PFA, and SF content, and the response value was compressive strength. Furthermore, response surface and contour lines were used to analyze the impact of composite admixtures. It is shown that the compounding of SP, PFA, and SF improve the rheological properties of manufactured sand concrete. For the single factor, SP has the greatest effect on the compressive strength of mechanism sand concrete and SF has the least effect. For compounding, SP and PFA have the most significant effect on the compressive strength of artificial sand shotcrete, and the compounding of PFA and SF have the least effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.