Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38203582›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification of DNA (LAMP) as an Alternative Method for Determining Bacteria in Wound Infections.

Monika Gieroń, Paulina Żarnowiec, Katarzyna Zegadło, Dawid Gmiter, Grzegorz Czerwonka, Wiesław Kaca, Beata Kręcisz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rapid Detection ofBiosensors · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Rapid molecular detection ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monika GierońFaculty of Medicine, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7604-2942
Paulina ŻarnowiecDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-406 Kielce, Poland.
Katarzyna ZegadłoDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-406 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3008-2695
Dawid GmiterDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-406 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8663-129X
Grzegorz CzerwonkaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-406 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6574-7880
Wiesław KacaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-406 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8734-7191
Beata KręciszFaculty of Medicine, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.
Jan Kochanowski University · PL

Funding

Jan Kochanowski University SUPB.RN .23.022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing number of patients with chronic wounds requires the development of quick and accurate diagnostics methods. One of the key and challenging aspects of treating ulcers is to control wound infection. Early detection of infection is essential for the application of suitable treatment methods, such as systemic antibiotics or other antimicrobial agents. Clinically, the most frequently used method for detecting microorganisms in wounds is through a swab and culture on appropriate media. This test has major limitations, such as the long bacterial growth time and the selectivity of bacterial growth. This article presents an overview of molecular methods for detecting bacteria in wounds, including real-time polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), genotyping, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). We focus on the LAMP method, which has not yet been widely used to detect bacteria in wounds, but it is an interesting alternative to conventional detection methods. LAMP does not require additional complicated equipment and provides the fastest detection time for microorganisms (approx. 30 min reaction). It also allows the use of many pairs of primers in one reaction and determination of up to 15 organisms in one sample. Isothermal amplification of DNA is currently the easiest and most economical method for microbial detection in wound infection. Direct visualization of the reaction with dyes, along with omitting DNA isolation, has increased the potential use of this method.

Indexed as

DNAMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesWound InfectionBacteriaDNA PrimersHumansDNADNA Primersbacterial infectionchronic woundgenotypingLAMPqPCRrapid detection

Identifiers

PMID38203582
PMCPMC10778741
OpenAlexW4390344311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.