ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Diversity of Clinical and Molecular Characteristics in Korean Patients with 16p11.2 Microdeletion Syndrome.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diversity of molecular karyotypes of 234 pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorder in chromosomal microarray analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Spectrum of Copy Number Variants in Fetal Congenital Heart Disease and Their Clinical Implications: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Center.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
16p11.2 copy number variations (CNVs) are increasingly recognized as one of the most frequent genomic disorders, and the 16p11.2 microdeletion exhibits broad phenotypic variability and a diverse clinical phenotype. We describe the neurodevelopmental course and discordant clinical phenotypes observed within and between individuals with identical 16p11.2 microdeletions. An analysis with the CytoScan Dx Assay was conducted on a GeneChip System 3000Dx, and the sample signals were then compared to a reference set using the Chromosome Analysis Suite software version 3.1. Ten patients from six separate families were identified with 16p11.2 microdeletions. Nine breakpoints (BPs) 4-5 and one BP2-5 of the 16p11.2 microdeletion were identified. All patients with 16p11.2 microdeletions exhibited developmental delay and/or intellectual disability. Sixty percent of patients presented with neonatal hypotonia, but muscle weakness improved with age. Benign infantile epilepsy manifested between the ages of 7-10 months (a median of 8 months) in six patients (60%). Vertebral dysplasia was observed in two patients (20%), and mild scoliosis was noted in three patients. Sixty percent of patients were overweight. We present six unrelated Korean families, among which identical 16p11.2 microdeletions resulted in diverse developmental trajectories and discordant phenotypes. The clinical variability and incomplete penetrance observed in individuals with 16p11.2 microdeletions remain unclear, posing challenges to accurate clinical interpretation and diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.