Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38203365›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Zebrafish (

Eman Hussen, Nada Aakel, Abdullah A Shaito, Maha Al-Asmakh, Haissam Abou-Saleh, Zain Z Zakaria

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eman HussenBiological Science Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Nada AakelBiomedical Sciences Department, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Abdullah A ShaitoBiomedical Research Center, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-3524-7962
Maha Al-AsmakhBiomedical Sciences Department, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Haissam Abou-SalehBiomedical Sciences Department, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-3460-1413
Zain Z ZakariaMedical and Health Sciences Office, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-9656-8367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing popularity of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) as an alternative to conventional tobacco products has raised concerns regarding their potential adverse effects. The cardiovascular system undergoes intricate processes forming the heart and blood vessels during fetal development. However, the precise impact of e-cigarette smoke and aerosols on these delicate developmental processes remains elusive. Previous studies have revealed changes in gene expression patterns, disruptions in cellular signaling pathways, and increased oxidative stress resulting from e-cigarette exposure. These findings indicate the potential for e-cigarettes to cause developmental and cardiovascular harm. This comprehensive review article discusses various aspects of electronic cigarette use, emphasizing the relevance of cardiovascular studies in Zebrafish for understanding the risks to human health. It also highlights novel experimental approaches and technologies while addressing their inherent challenges and limitations.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsPerciformesAnimalsHeartHumansZebrafishcardiotoxicityelectronic cigarettestobaccoZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID38203365
PMCPMC10779276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.