Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38203101›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

In-Depth Evaluation of Saliency Maps for Interpreting Convolutional Neural Network Decisions in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma Based on Fundus Imaging.

Jose Sigut, Francisco Fumero, José Estévez, Silvia Alayón, Tinguaro Díaz-Alemán

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Saliency-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Explanations.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jose SigutDepartment of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Universidad de La Laguna, Camino San Francisco de Paula, 19, La Laguna, 38203 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3309-5953
Francisco FumeroDepartment of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Universidad de La Laguna, Camino San Francisco de Paula, 19, La Laguna, 38203 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9806-2477
José EstévezDepartment of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Universidad de La Laguna, Camino San Francisco de Paula, 19, La Laguna, 38203 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Silvia AlayónDepartment of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Universidad de La Laguna, Camino San Francisco de Paula, 19, La Laguna, 38203 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8498-3275
Tinguaro Díaz-AlemánDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Carretera Ofra S/N, La Laguna, 38320 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4579-0555
Universidad de La Laguna · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ES

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación n/aUniversity of La Laguna n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma, a leading cause of blindness, damages the optic nerve, making early diagnosis challenging due to no initial symptoms. Fundus eye images taken with a non-mydriatic retinograph help diagnose glaucoma by revealing structural changes, including the optic disc and cup. This research aims to thoroughly analyze saliency maps in interpreting convolutional neural network decisions for diagnosing glaucoma from fundus images. These maps highlight the most influential image regions guiding the network's decisions. Various network architectures were trained and tested on 739 optic nerve head images, with nine saliency methods used. Some other popular datasets were also used for further validation. The results reveal disparities among saliency maps, with some consensus between the folds corresponding to the same architecture. Concerning the significance of optic disc sectors, there is generally a lack of agreement with standard medical criteria. The background, nasal, and temporal sectors emerge as particularly influential for neural network decisions, showing a likelihood of being the most relevant ranging from 14.55% to 28.16% on average across all evaluated datasets. We can conclude that saliency maps are usually difficult to interpret and even the areas indicated as the most relevant can be very unintuitive. Therefore, its usefulness as an explanatory tool may be compromised, at least in problems such as the one addressed in this study, where the features defining the model prediction are generally not consistently reflected in relevant regions of the saliency maps, and they even cannot always be related to those used as medical standards.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOptic DiskDiagnostic ImagingFundus OculiHumansNeural Networks, Computerconvolutional neural networksdeep learningglaucoma diagnosisretinal fundus imagessaliency methods

Identifiers

PMID38203101
PMCPMC10781365
OpenAlexW4390467886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.