Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38203076›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Benchmarking of Sensor Configurations and Measurement Sites for Out-of-the-Lab Photoplethysmography.

Max Nobre Supelnic, Afonso Fortes Ferreira, Patrícia Justo Bota, Luís Brás-Rosário, Hugo Plácido da Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Max Nobre SupelnicDepartment of Bioengineering (DBE), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0004-3240-1164
Afonso Fortes FerreiraInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores-Microsistemas e Nanotecnologias (INESC MN), 1000-029 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3604-1272
Patrícia Justo BotaDepartment of Bioengineering (DBE), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0514-7517
Luís Brás-RosárioCardiology Department, Santa Maria University Hospital (CHLN), Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0014-1543
Hugo Plácido da SilvaDepartment of Bioengineering (DBE), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6764-8432
Instituto de Telecomunicações · PTInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Microsistemas e Nanotecnologias · PTInstituto Superior Técnico · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

AIDFM DSAIPA/AI/0122/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia 2020.06675.BD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoplethysmography (PPG) is used for heart-rate monitoring in a variety of contexts and applications due to its versatility and simplicity. These applications, namely studies involving PPG data acquisition during day-to-day activities, require reliable and continuous measurements, which are often performed at the index finger or wrist. However, some PPG sensors are susceptible to saturation, motion artifacts, and discomfort upon their use. In this paper, an off-the-shelf PPG sensor was benchmarked and modified to improve signal saturation. Moreover, this paper explores the feasibility of using an optimized sensor in the lower limb as an alternative measurement site. Data were collected from 28 subjects with ages ranging from 18 to 59 years. To validate the sensors' performance, signal saturation and quality, wave morphology, performance of automatic systolic peak detection, and heart-rate estimation, were compared. For the upper and lower limb locations, the index finger and the first toe were used as reference locations, respectively. Lowering the amplification stage of the PPG sensor resulted in a significant reduction in signal saturation, from 18% to 0.5%. Systolic peak detection at rest using an automatic algorithm showed a sensitivity and precision of 0.99 each. The posterior wrist and upper arm showed pulse wave morphology correlations of 0.93 and 0.92, respectively. For these locations, peak detection sensitivity and precision were 0.95, 0.94 and 0.89, 0.89, respectively. Overall, the adjusted PPG sensors are a good alternative for obtaining high-quality signals at the fingertips, and for new measurement sites, the posterior pulse and the upper arm allow for high-quality signal extraction.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingPhotoplethysmographyFingersHumansUpper ExtremityWristheart ratemeasurement sitespeak detectionphotoplethysmographysaturationwave morphology

Identifiers

PMID38203076
PMCPMC10781263
OpenAlexW4390478846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.