Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38203060›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

STELO: A New Modular Robotic Gait Device for Acquired Brain Injury-Exploring Its Usability.

Carlos Cumplido-Trasmonte, Eva Barquín-Santos, María Dolores Gor-García-Fogeda, Alberto Plaza-Flores, David García-Varela, Leticia Ibáñez-Herrán, Carlos González-Alted, Paola Díaz-Valles, Cristina López-Pascua, Arantxa Castrillo-Calvillo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carlos Cumplido-TrasmonteInternational Doctoral School, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2878-9272
Eva Barquín-SantosMarsi Bionics SL, 28521 Madrid, Spain.
María Dolores Gor-García-FogedaMarsi Bionics SL, 28521 Madrid, Spain.
Alberto Plaza-FloresMarsi Bionics SL, 28521 Madrid, Spain.
David García-VarelaMarsi Bionics SL, 28521 Madrid, Spain.
Leticia Ibáñez-HerránMarsi Bionics SL, 28521 Madrid, Spain.
Carlos González-AltedSpanish National Reference Centre for Brain Injury (CEADAC), 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4271-3012
Paola Díaz-VallesSpanish National Reference Centre for Brain Injury (CEADAC), 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Cristina López-PascuaCentro Lescer, 28035 Madrid, Spain.
Arantxa Castrillo-CalvilloCentro Lescer, 28035 Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Molina-RuedaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8616-5505
Roemi FernandezCentre for Automation and Robotics (CAR), CSIC-UPM, Ctra. Campo Real km 0.2-La Poveda-Arganda del Rey, 28500 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0552-5407
Elena Garcia-ArmadaMarsi Bionics SL, 28521 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Consejería de Educación e Investigación de la Comunidad de Madrid IND2022/TIC-23501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the prevalence of acquired brain injury (ABI) has been on the rise, leading to impaired gait functionality in affected individuals. Traditional gait exoskeletons are typically rigid and bilateral and lack adaptability. To address this, the STELO, a pioneering modular gait-assistive device, was developed. This device can be externally configured with joint modules to cater to the diverse impairments of each patient, aiming to enhance adaptability and efficiency. This study aims to assess the safety and usability of the initial functional modular prototype, STELO, in a sample of 14 ABI-diagnosed participants. Adverse events, device adjustment assistance and time, and gait performance were evaluated during three sessions of device use. The results revealed that STELO was safe, with no serious adverse events reported. The need for assistance and time required for device adjustment decreased progressively over the sessions. Although there was no significant improvement in walking speed observed after three sessions of using STELO, participants and therapists reported satisfactory levels of comfort and usability in questionnaires. Overall, this study demonstrates that the STELO modular device offers a safe and adaptable solution for individuals with ABI, with positive user and therapist feedback.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesRobotic Surgical ProceduresSelf-Help DevicesGaitHumansWalking SpeedABIgaitmodularneurologyrobotics

Identifiers

PMID38203060
PMCPMC10781374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.