ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Novel Signal Restoration Method of Noisy Photoplethysmograms for Uninterrupted Health Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- ECG sonification methods for robust and generalizable clinical decision support.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Health-tracking from photoplethysmography (PPG) signals is significantly hindered by motion artifacts (MAs). Although many algorithms exist to detect MAs, the corrupted signal often remains unexploited. This work introduces a novel method able to reconstruct noisy PPGs and facilitate uninterrupted health monitoring. The algorithm starts with spectral-based MA detection, followed by signal reconstruction by using the morphological and heart-rate variability information from the clean segments adjacent to noise. The algorithm was tested on (a) 30 noisy PPGs of a maximum 20 s noise duration and (b) 28 originally clean PPGs, after noise addition (2-120 s) (1) with and (2) without cancellation of the corresponding clean segment. Sampling frequency was 250 Hz after resampling. Noise detection was evaluated by means of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. For the evaluation of signal reconstruction, the heart-rate (HR) was compared via Pearson correlation (PC) and absolute error (a) between ECGs and reconstructed PPGs and (b) between original and reconstructed PPGs. Bland-Altman (BA) analysis for the differences in HR estimation on original and reconstructed segments of (b) was also performed. Noise detection accuracy was 90.91% for (a) and 99.38-100% for (b). For the PPG reconstruction, HR showed 99.31% correlation in (a) and >90% for all noise lengths in (b). Mean absolute error was 1.59 bpm for (a) and 1.26-1.82 bpm for (b). BA analysis indicated that, in most cases, 90% or more of the recordings fall within the confidence interval, regardless of the noise length. Optimal performance is achieved even for signals of noise up to 2 min, allowing for the utilization and further analysis of recordings that would otherwise be discarded. Thereby, the algorithm can be implemented in monitoring devices, assisting in uninterrupted health-tracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.