Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38203003›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Novel Signal Restoration Method of Noisy Photoplethysmograms for Uninterrupted Health Monitoring.

Aikaterini Vraka, Roberto Zangróniz, Aurelio Quesada, Fernando Hornero, Raúl Alcaraz, José J Rieta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aikaterini VrakaBiosignals and Minimally Invasive Technologies (BioMIT.org), Electronic Engineering Department, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5984-904X
Roberto ZangrónizResearch Group in Electronic, Biomedical and Telecommunication Engineering, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0334-8155
Aurelio QuesadaArrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, General University Hospital Consortium of Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-1993
Fernando HorneroCardiovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7560-2781
Raúl AlcarazResearch Group in Electronic, Biomedical and Telecommunication Engineering, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0942-3638
José J RietaBiosignals and Minimally Invasive Technologies (BioMIT.org), Electronic Engineering Department, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3364-6380
Universitat Politècnica de València · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ES

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2021-00X128525-IV0Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2021-123804OB-I00Agencia Estatal de Investigación TED2021-130935B-I00Generalitat Valenciana AICO/2021/286Joint Funding of Spanish Government and European Regional Development Fund 10.13039/501100011033Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha SBPLY/17/180501/000411Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha SBPLY/21/180501/000186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health-tracking from photoplethysmography (PPG) signals is significantly hindered by motion artifacts (MAs). Although many algorithms exist to detect MAs, the corrupted signal often remains unexploited. This work introduces a novel method able to reconstruct noisy PPGs and facilitate uninterrupted health monitoring. The algorithm starts with spectral-based MA detection, followed by signal reconstruction by using the morphological and heart-rate variability information from the clean segments adjacent to noise. The algorithm was tested on (a) 30 noisy PPGs of a maximum 20 s noise duration and (b) 28 originally clean PPGs, after noise addition (2-120 s) (1) with and (2) without cancellation of the corresponding clean segment. Sampling frequency was 250 Hz after resampling. Noise detection was evaluated by means of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. For the evaluation of signal reconstruction, the heart-rate (HR) was compared via Pearson correlation (PC) and absolute error (a) between ECGs and reconstructed PPGs and (b) between original and reconstructed PPGs. Bland-Altman (BA) analysis for the differences in HR estimation on original and reconstructed segments of (b) was also performed. Noise detection accuracy was 90.91% for (a) and 99.38-100% for (b). For the PPG reconstruction, HR showed 99.31% correlation in (a) and >90% for all noise lengths in (b). Mean absolute error was 1.59 bpm for (a) and 1.26-1.82 bpm for (b). BA analysis indicated that, in most cases, 90% or more of the recordings fall within the confidence interval, regardless of the noise length. Optimal performance is achieved even for signals of noise up to 2 min, allowing for the utilization and further analysis of recordings that would otherwise be discarded. Thereby, the algorithm can be implemented in monitoring devices, assisting in uninterrupted health-tracking.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPhotoplethysmographyArtifactsElectrocardiographyHeart Ratehealth-trackingheart-rateheart-rate variabilitymotion artifactsnoise detectionphotoplethysmographypulse rate variabilitysignal reconstructionuninterrupted monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38203003
PMCPMC10781253
OpenAlexW4390269563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.