ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Application of AI for Short-Term PV Generation Forecast.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficient use of the photovoltaic power requires a good estimation of the PV generation. That is why the use of good techniques for forecast is necessary. In this research paper, Long Short-Term Memory, Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory and the Temporal convolutional network are studied in depth to forecast the photovoltaic power, voltage and efficiency of a 1320 Wp amorphous plant installed in the Technology Support Centre in the University Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid (Spain). The accuracy of these techniques are compared using experimental data along one year, applying 1 timestep or 15 min and 96 step times or 24 h, showing that TCN exhibits outstanding performance, compared with the two other techniques. For instance, it presents better results in all forecast variables and both forecast horizons, achieving an overall Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.0024 for 15 min forecasts and 0.0058 for 24 h forecasts. In addition, the sensitivity analyses for the TCN technique is performed and shows that the accuracy is reduced as the forecast horizon increases and that the 6 months of dataset is sufficient to obtain an adequate result with an MSE value of 0.0080 and a coefficient of determination of 0.90 in the worst scenarios (24 h of forecast).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.