Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202424›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Effectiveness of Co-Inoculation by Consortia of Microorganisms Depends on the Type of Plant and the Soil Microbiome.

Ekaterina Alexeevna Sokolova, Olga Viktorovna Mishukova, Inna Viktorovna Hlistun, Irina Nikolaevna Tromenschleger, Artem Yurievich Tikunov, Andrey Dmitrievich Manakhov, Evgeny Ivanovich Rogaev, Oleg Alexandrovich Savenkov, Maria Dmitrievna Buyanova, Ilya Vladimirovich Ivanov and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TwoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ekaterina Alexeevna SokolovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4852-5661
Olga Viktorovna MishukovaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Inna Viktorovna HlistunInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Irina Nikolaevna TromenschlegerInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Artem Yurievich TikunovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5613-5447
Andrey Dmitrievich ManakhovDepartment of Genetics, Centre for Genetics and Life Science, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 354340 Sirius, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5163-8747
Evgeny Ivanovich RogaevDepartment of Genetics, Centre for Genetics and Life Science, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 354340 Sirius, Russia.
Oleg Alexandrovich SavenkovInstitute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9088-285X
Maria Dmitrievna BuyanovaInstitute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Ilya Vladimirovich IvanovInstitute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Natalya Valentinovna SmirnovaInstitute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3679-4263
Elena Nikolaevna VoroninaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Novosibirsk State University · RUSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUSirius University of Science and Technology · RUInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine · RU

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation agreement No. 075-15-2021-1085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amalgamation of mineral and targeted bacterial preparations represents a new generation of agricultural technology. Inoculation with combined preparations of microorganisms is more effective than inoculation with a single microorganism in stimulating plant growth by providing a more balanced diet for various crops. In this work, the effect of inoculation of 20 consortium variants on the yield indicators of three crops (wheat, buckwheat, corn) and the soil microbiome in the open field was investigated. The soil microbiome was defined by 16S rRNA sequences through NGS. The species richness of the soil microbial community (alpha diversity) was similar for all studied samples. A beta-diversity analysis revealed that the microbial diversity of three soil samples (C.bw, F.bw and Soil.bw) differed significantly from all others. At the phylum level, the number of

Indexed as

co-inoculationconsortia of microorganismssoil microbiom

Identifiers

PMID38202424
PMCPMC10780792
OpenAlexW4390467936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.