Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202417›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Nano-Agrochemicals as Substitutes for Pesticides: Prospects and Risks.

Shehbaz Ali, Naveed Ahmad, Mudasir A Dar, Sehrish Manan, Abida Rani, Suliman Mohammed Suliman Alghanem, Khalid Ali Khan, Sivasamy Sethupathy, Noureddine Elboughdiri, Yasser S Mostafa and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Shehbaz AliBiofuels Institute, School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4548-5702
Naveed AhmadJoint Center for Single Cell Biology, Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Agri-Seeds, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2038-2838
Mudasir A DarBiofuels Institute, School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6063-3385
Sehrish MananBiofuels Institute, School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7657-7584
Abida RaniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8423-0270
Suliman Mohammed Suliman AlghanemDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Qassim University, Burydah 52571, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Ali KhanApplied College, Mahala Campus and the Unit of Bee Research and Honey Production/Research Center for Advanced Materials Science (RCAMS), King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Sivasamy SethupathyBiofuels Institute, School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5466-4943
Noureddine ElboughdiriChemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Ha'il, P.O. Box 2440, Ha'il 81441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2923-3062
Yasser S MostafaDepartment of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Saad A AlamriDepartment of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed HashemDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2593-3387
Muhammad ShahidDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-1317-1621
Daochen ZhuBiofuels Institute, School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Jiangsu University · CNKing Khalid University · SAAssiut University · EGBahauddin Zakariya University · PKGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PKQassim University · SAShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity of Ha'il · SA

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University R.G.P. 2/223/44
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review delves into the mesmerizing technology of nano-agrochemicals, specifically pesticides and herbicides, and their potential to aid in the achievement of UN SDG 17, which aims to reduce hunger and poverty globally. The global market for conventional pesticides and herbicides is expected to reach USD 82.9 billion by 2027, growing 2.7% annually, with North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region being the biggest markets. However, the extensive use of chemical pesticides has proven adverse effects on human health as well as the ecosystem. Therefore, the efficacy, mechanisms, and environmental impacts of conventional pesticides require sustainable alternatives for effective pest management. Undoubtedly, nano-agrochemicals have the potential to completely transform agriculture by increasing crop yields with reduced environmental contamination. The present review discusses the effectiveness and environmental impact of nanopesticides as promising strategies for sustainable agriculture. It provides a concise overview of green nano-agrochemical synthesis and agricultural applications, and the efficacy of nano-agrochemicals against pests including insects and weeds. Nano-agrochemical pesticides are investigated due to their unique size and exceptional performance advantages over conventional ones. Here, we have focused on the environmental risks and current state of nano-agrochemicals, emphasizing the need for further investigations. The review also draws the attention of agriculturists and stakeholders to the current trends of nanomaterial use in agriculture especially for reducing plant diseases and pests. A discussion of the pros and cons of nano-agrochemicals is paramount for their application in sustainable agriculture.

Indexed as

agricultureherbicidesnanomaterialspesticidesplant disease

Identifiers

PMID38202417
PMCPMC10780915
OpenAlexW4390403435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.