Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202405›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Salt Tolerance in Soybeans: Focus on Screening Methods and Genetics.

Rong-Xia Guan, Xiao-Yang Guo, Yue Qu, Zheng-Wei Zhang, Li-Gao Bao, Rui-Yun Ye, Ru-Zhen Chang, Li-Juan Qiu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rong-Xia GuanThe National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Key Lab of Soybean Biology, Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6826-9239
Xiao-Yang GuoThe National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Key Lab of Soybean Biology, Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Yue QuAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Zheng-Wei ZhangThe National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Key Lab of Soybean Biology, Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Li-Gao BaoAgriculture and Animal Husbandry Technology Promotion Center of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010018, China.
Rui-Yun YeThe Economic Development Center of China State Farm, Beijing 100122, China.
Ru-Zhen ChangThe National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Key Lab of Soybean Biology, Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Li-Juan QiuThe National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement (NFCRI), Key Lab of Soybean Biology, Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNAustralian Research Council · AUInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFD1201702National Natural Science Foundation of China 31830066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salinity greatly affects the production of soybeans in arid and semi-arid lands around the world. The responses of soybeans to salt stress at germination, emergence, and other seedling stages have been evaluated in multitudes of studies over the past decades. Considerable salt-tolerant accessions have been identified. The association between salt tolerance responses during early and later growth stages may not be as significant as expected. Genetic analysis has confirmed that salt tolerance is distinctly tied to specific soybean developmental stages. Our understanding of salt tolerance mechanisms in soybeans is increasing due to the identification of key salt tolerance genes. In this review, we focus on the methods of soybean salt tolerance screening, progress in forward genetics, potential mechanisms involved in salt tolerance, and the importance of translating laboratory findings into field experiments via marker-assisted pyramiding or genetic engineering approaches, and ultimately developing salt-tolerant soybean varieties that produce high and stable yields. Progress has been made in the past decades, and new technologies will help mine novel salt tolerance genes and translate the mechanism of salt tolerance into new varieties via effective routes.

Indexed as

gene identificationion homeostasissalinity stresssalinity tolerancesoybean

Identifiers

PMID38202405
PMCPMC10780708
OpenAlexW4390348335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.