Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202233›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics for Endometrial Cancer MRI: Exploring the Whats, Whys and Hows.

Elisabetta Leo, Arnaldo Stanzione, Mariaelena Miele, Renato Cuocolo, Giacomo Sica, Mariano Scaglione, Luigi Camera, Simone Maurea, Pier Paolo Mainenti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabetta LeoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-5939-2194
Arnaldo StanzioneDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7905-5789
Mariaelena MieleDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Renato CuocoloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1452-1574
Giacomo SicaDepartment of Radiology, Monaldi Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9518-9744
Mariano ScaglioneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0910-8064
Luigi CameraDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Simone MaureaDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8269-3765
Pier Paolo MainentiInstitute of Biostructures and Bioimaging of the National Council of Research (CNR), 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3592-808X
University of Naples Federico II · ITInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging · ITOspedale Monaldi · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is intricately linked to obesity and diabetes, which are widespread risk factors. Medical imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plays a major role in EC assessment, particularly for disease staging. However, the diagnostic performance of MRI exhibits variability in the detection of clinically relevant prognostic factors (e.g., deep myometrial invasion and metastatic lymph nodes assessment). To address these challenges and enhance the value of MRI, radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms emerge as promising tools with a potential to impact EC risk assessment, treatment planning, and prognosis prediction. These advanced post-processing techniques allow us to quantitatively analyse medical images, providing novel insights into cancer characteristics beyond conventional qualitative image evaluation. However, despite the growing interest and research efforts, the integration of radiomics and AI to EC management is still far from clinical practice and represents a possible perspective rather than an actual reality. This review focuses on the state of radiomics and AI in EC MRI, emphasizing risk stratification and prognostic factor prediction, aiming to illuminate potential advancements and address existing challenges in the field.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceendometrial cancerMRIradiomics

Identifiers

PMID38202233
PMCPMC10779496
OpenAlexW4390470795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.