Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202187›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Artificial Intelligence on Diagnostic Aid of Leprosy: A Systematic Literature Review.

Jacks Renan Neves Fernandes, Ariel Soares Teles, Thayaná Ribeiro Silva Fernandes, Lucas Daniel Batista Lima, Surjeet Balhara, Nishu Gupta, Silmar Teixeira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Independent assessment of the WHO Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases application for leprosy detection.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jacks Renan Neves FernandesPhD Program in Biotechnology-Northeast Biotechnology Network, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina 64049-550, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7868-0673
Ariel Soares TelesPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Parnaíba Delta Federal University, Parnaíba 64202-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0840-3870
Thayaná Ribeiro Silva FernandesPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Parnaíba Delta Federal University, Parnaíba 64202-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6590-4620
Lucas Daniel Batista LimaPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Parnaíba Delta Federal University, Parnaíba 64202-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4278-6975
Surjeet BalharaDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3281-6851
Nishu GuptaDepartment of Electronic Systems, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1568-368X
Silmar TeixeiraPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Parnaíba Delta Federal University, Parnaíba 64202-020, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9240-1228

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 308059/2022-0National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 308736/2022-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leprosy is a neglected tropical disease that can cause physical injury and mental disability. Diagnosis is primarily clinical, but can be inconclusive due to the absence of initial symptoms and similarity to other dermatological diseases. Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques have been used in dermatology, assisting clinical procedures and diagnostics. In particular, AI-supported solutions have been proposed in the literature to aid in the diagnosis of leprosy, and this Systematic Literature Review (SLR) aims to characterize the state of the art. This SLR followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) framework and was conducted in the following databases: ACM Digital Library, IEEE Digital Library, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. Potentially relevant research articles were retrieved. The researchers applied criteria to select the studies, assess their quality, and perform the data extraction process. Moreover, 1659 studies were retrieved, of which 21 were included in the review after selection. Most of the studies used images of skin lesions, classical machine learning algorithms, and multi-class classification tasks to develop models to diagnose dermatological diseases. Most of the reviewed articles did not target leprosy as the study's primary objective but rather the classification of different skin diseases (among them, leprosy). Although AI-supported leprosy diagnosis is constantly evolving, research in this area is still in its early stage, then studies are required to make AI solutions mature enough to be transformed into clinical practice. Expanding research efforts on leprosy diagnosis, coupled with the advocacy of open science in leveraging AI for diagnostic support, can yield robust and influential outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdiagnosisHansen’s diseaseleprosymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38202187
PMCPMC10779723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.