Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202184›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Epistemic Trust Is a Critical Success Factor in Psychosomatic Rehabilitation-Results from a Naturalistic Multi-Center Observational Study.

David Riedl, Hanna Kampling, Johannes Kruse, Tobias Nolte, Karin Labek, Christina Kirchhoff, Vincent Grote, Michael J Fischer, Alexander Knipel, Astrid Lampe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David RiedlLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, 1100 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0518-3144
Hanna KamplingDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5213-0179
Johannes KruseDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany.
Tobias NolteAnna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London N1 9JH, UK.
Karin LabekInstitute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5775-3076
Christina KirchhoffUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Vincent GroteLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, 1100 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4421-2449
Michael J FischerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, 1100 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6345-0813
Alexander KnipelVAMED Rehabilitation Center Oberndorf, 5110 Oberndorf, Austria.
Astrid LampeLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, 1100 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge about critical success factors underpinning beneficial treatment outcomes in psychosomatic inpatient rehabilitation is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of patients' epistemic stance in relation to the improvement of psychological distress during rehabilitation. In this naturalistic longitudinal observational study,

Indexed as

critical success factorsdepressionepistemic trustpsychosomaticspsychotherapyrehabilitationtherapy outcome

Identifiers

PMID38202184
PMCPMC10780285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.