Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202172›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Performance of the FebriDx Rapid Point-of-Care Test for Differentiating Bacterial and Viral Respiratory Tract Infections in Patients with a Suspected Respiratory Tract Infection in the Emergency Department.

Kirby Tong-Minh, Katrijn Daenen, Henrik Endeman, Christian Ramakers, Diederik Gommers, Eric van Gorp, Yuri van der Does

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Rapid Test to Differentiate Viral From Bacterial Infections: Searching for the Holy Grail.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirby Tong-MinhDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Katrijn DaenenDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-5664-5393
Henrik EndemanDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Christian RamakersDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diederik GommersDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric van GorpDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Yuri van der DoesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

Lumos Diagnostics This study was supported by Lumos Diagnostics who provided the FebriDx test for the purpose of this study.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FebriDx is a rapid point-of-care test combining qualitative measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP) and Myxovirus Resistance Protein A (MxA) using a disposable test device to detect and differentiate acute bacterial from viral respiratory tract infections. The goal of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of FebriDx in patients with suspected respiratory tract infections in the emergency department (ED). This was an observational cohort study, performed in the ED of an academic hospital. Patients were included if they had a suspected infection. The primary outcome was the presence of a bacterial or viral infection, determined by clinical adjudication by an expert panel. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of FebriDx for the presence of bacterial versus non-bacterial infections, and viral versus non-viral infections were calculated. Between March 2019 and November 2020, 244 patients were included. A bacterial infection was present in 41%, viral infection was present in 24%, and 4% of the patients had both viral and bacterial pathogens. FebriDx demonstrated high sensitivity in the detection of bacterial infection (87%), high NPV (91%) to rule out bacterial infection, and high specificity (94%) for viral infection in patients with a suspected infection in the ED.

Indexed as

emergency medicineinfectious diseasespoint-of-care

Identifiers

PMID38202172
PMCPMC10779507
OpenAlexW4390265664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.