Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202168›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC), Oncological Outcomes and Long-Term Survival among Patients with Gastric Cancer and Limited Peritoneal Disease Progression after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Sebastian Kobiałka, Katarzyna Sędłak, Zuzanna Pelc, Radosław Mlak, Yutaka Endo, Paweł Bogacz, Andrzej Kurylcio, Wojciech P Polkowski, Timothy M Pawlik, Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian KobiałkaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-7595-613X
Katarzyna SędłakDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3152-1063
Zuzanna PelcDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-9586
Radosław MlakDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7399-8340
Yutaka EndoDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Paweł BogaczDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.
Andrzej KurylcioDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.
Wojciech P PolkowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6455-5636
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7994-9870
Karol Rawicz-PruszyńskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2555-2114
Medical University of Lublin · PLThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe role of surgery in stage IV gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (PM) remains unclear. The objective of the current single-center study was to define the impact of gastrectomy with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on outcomes among Central European GC patients with limited peritoneal disease progression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

methodsPatients with histologically confirmed GC who underwent curative-intent multimodal treatment between 2013 and 2023 were included. Patients without adenocarcinoma, who did not undergo gastrectomy, had early (cT1) or metastatic GC at the time of initial diagnosis, who underwent multivisceral resection, incomplete cytoreduction or palliative care, died before planned curative-intent treatment, or had incomplete clinical or pathological missing information were excluded.

resultsA total of 74 patients who underwent curative-intent treatment for GC with PM were included in the final analytic cohort. Patients who underwent gastrectomy with CRS+HIPEC were less likely to achieve TOO (CRS+HIPEC: 28% vs. CRS: 57.1%,

conclusionsData from the current study demonstrated a lack of survival benefit among advanced GC patients with PM undergoing gastrectomy with CRS+HIPEC when compared with individuals after gastrectomy with CRS alone. Administration of perioperative chemotherapy and achievement of TO failed to withstand the peritoneal disease progression during NAC.

Indexed as

gastric cancerHIPECperitoneal metastasis

Identifiers

PMID38202168
PMCPMC10779559
OpenAlexW4390265661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.