Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202166›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Reperfusion Injury: How Can We Reduce It by Pre-, Per-, and Postconditioning.

Maria Buske, Steffen Desch, Gerd Heusch, Tienush Rassaf, Ingo Eitel, Holger Thiele, Hans-Josef Feistritzer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria BuskeDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Steffen DeschDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Gerd HeuschInstitute for Pathophysiology, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University of Essen Medical School, 45122 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7078-4160
Tienush RassafDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8001-0265
Ingo EitelMedical Clinic II, Clinic for Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0169-998X
Hans-Josef FeistritzerDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig Heart Institute · DEWest German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While early coronary reperfusion via primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is established as the most efficacious therapy for minimizing infarct size (IS) in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the restoration of blood flow also introduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), leading to cardiomyocyte death. Among diverse methods, ischemic conditioning (IC), achieved through repetitive cycles of ischemia and reperfusion, has emerged as the most promising method to mitigate IRI. IC can be performed by applying the protective stimulus directly to the affected myocardium or indirectly to non-affected tissue, which is known as remote ischemic conditioning (RIC). In clinical practice, RIC is often applied by serial inflations and deflations of a blood pressure cuff on a limb. Despite encouraging preclinical studies, as well as clinical studies demonstrating reductions in enzymatic IS and myocardial injury on imaging, the observed impact on clinical outcome has been disappointing so far. Nevertheless, previous studies indicate a potential benefit of IC in high-risk STEMI patients. Additional research is needed to evaluate the impact of IC in such high-risk cohorts. The objective of this review is to summarize the pathophysiological background and preclinical and clinical data of IRI reduction by IC.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctioninfarct sizeischemia-reperfusion injuryischemic conditioningmyocardial injurypercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID38202166
PMCPMC10779793
OpenAlexW4390275019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.