ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Non-Invasive Imaging Assessment in Patients with Aortic Coarctation: A Contemporary Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Diseases in Adults: Opportunities for Improving Diagnostic Strategies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Ischemic stroke as the initial presentation of undiagnosed aortic coarctation in an adolescent: a case report.Oxford medical case reports · 2026Article
- Noninvasive hemodynamic assessment of aortic coarctation: multimodal imaging based-computational fluid dynamics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodality Imaging Approach in Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Aortic Coarctation in Adulthood.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Coarctation of the Aorta Complicated With Aortic Thrombus: Assessment by Cardiac Computed Tomography in Adults.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Multimodality Imaging Approach to Infective Endocarditis: Current Opinion in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Unique Challenge of Coronary Artery Disease in Adult Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Investigation of Relationship between Hemodynamic and Morphometric Characteristics of Aortas in Pediatric Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Importance of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Applied to Congenital Heart Diseases in Pediatric Age: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- Secondary hypertension and aortic coarctation in a young adult: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- How Will Artificial Intelligence Shape the Future of Decision-Making in Congenital Heart Disease?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Cardiac Adaptation and Preferential Streaming in Fetuses with Multiple Nuchal Cords.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is a congenital abnormality characterized by a narrowing of the aortic lumen, which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if left untreated. Even after repair and despite significant advances in therapeutic management, these patients have overall reduced long-term survival due to the consequences of chronic afterload increase. Cardiovascular imaging is key from the first diagnosis to serial follow-up. In recent years, novel imaging techniques have emerged, increasing accessibility to advanced imaging modalities and enabling early and non-invasive identification of complications after repair. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the role of different imaging techniques in the evaluation and management of patients with native or repaired CoA, highlighting their unique strengths and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.