Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202022›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Exchange of a Tracheal Tube and Supraglottic Airway Device: Evaluation of Different Techniques in Three Simulated Airway Scenarios (TUBE Study)-A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Study.

Marc Kriege, Tim Demare, Robert Ruemmler, Irene Schmidtmann, Janosh Wojciechowski, Anneke Busch, Thomas Ott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 64% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marc KriegeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-7908
Tim DemareDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Robert RuemmlerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9265-6052
Irene SchmidtmannInstitute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8743-6752
Janosh WojciechowskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Asklepios Paulinen Hospital Wiesbaden, 65197 Wiesbaden, Germany.
Anneke BuschDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Asklepios Paulinen Hospital Wiesbaden, 65197 Wiesbaden, Germany.
Thomas OttDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7510-7679
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEAsklepios · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe swapping of a supraglottic airway device or a tracheal tube in anaesthetised adult patients is a challenging procedure because potential complications through hypoxemia and loss of airway may occur, with life-threatening implications. This study aims to evaluate which airway technique offers the highest success rate concerning a secure airway in established supraglottic airway and tracheal tube airway exchange scenarios.

methodsAfter ethical approval, anaesthesiologists were randomised 1:1 into simulated scenarios: an LTS group (malpositioned laryngeal tube) and a Cuff group (relevant cuff leakage of a placed tracheal tube). After that, both groups completed a common scenario consisting of a partially obstructed tracheal tube lumen in a fixed prone position with a Mayfield clamp. The primary endpoint was a successful tracheal airway exchange within ten minutes after the start of the scenario and before severe hypoxemia (SpO

resultsIn total, 60 anaesthesiologists (LTS group

conclusionThe results of this simulation-based study reflect that the exchange of an existing but insufficient airway device in clinical practice is a high-risk procedure. Especially in a fixed prone position, the deliberate evaluation of the existing airway patency and well-conceived airway management in the case of the accidental loss of the airway or obstructed airway access are crucial.

Indexed as

airway managementanaesthesiologyexisting airway devicelaryngeal maskslaryngoscopyscenario trainingsimulationtracheal intubation

Identifiers

PMID38202022
PMCPMC10779719
OpenAlexW4389937546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.