Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38202021›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Emerging Therapeutic Options for Refractory Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: The Evidence and Proposed Mechanisms of Action.

Nathaniel C Nelson, Rebecca Kogan, Rany Condos, Kerry M Hena

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. IL17 in Sarcoidosis - A level playing field?Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathaniel C NelsonDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University, 301 E 17th St Suite 550, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Rebecca KoganDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University, 301 E 17th St Suite 550, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Rany CondosDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University, 301 E 17th St Suite 550, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Kerry M HenaDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University, 301 E 17th St Suite 550, New York, NY 10003, USA.
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease with heterogenous clinical phenotypes characterized by non-necrotizing granuloma formation in affected organs. Most disease either remits spontaneously or responds to corticosteroids and second-line disease-modifying therapies. These medications are associated with numerous toxicities that can significantly impact patient quality-of-life and often limit their long-term use. Additionally, a minority of patients experience chronic, progressive disease that proves refractory to standard treatments. To date, there are limited data to guide the selection of alternative third-line medications for these patients. This review will outline the pathobiological rationale behind current and emerging therapeutic agents for refractory or drug-intolerant sarcoidosis and summarize the existing clinical evidence in support of their use.

Indexed as

fibrosisgranulomarefractorysarcoidosistherapy

Identifiers

PMID38202021
PMCPMC10779381
OpenAlexW4389950237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.